Welcome to Steelbeasts.com

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

lavictoireestlavie

Members
  • Content count

    650
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About lavictoireestlavie

  • Rank
    Senior Member

Personal Information

  • Location
    Leclercville in Lecleria
  • Interests
    Leclerc, AMX-56, Char Leclerc, Leclerc Serie 1, Leclerc Serie 2 , Leclerc Serie XXI, Leclerc,etc.
  • Occupation
    Leclerc (I dream of Leclercs each and every day)

Recent Profile Visitors

2,116 profile views
  1. Is that with TUSK I /II or just the stadard issue ? 72.5 metric tons is pretty hefty!
  2. I received mine too.
  3. Never say never. The Merkava Mk3(Baz and Dor Dalet) and Mk4 could be implemented as non-crewable AI tanks like the current Merkava 2B. I do not want to be "promiscuous" towards "my baby" but they are beauties:
  4. From the Greek Armor Trials: According to the results of the trials, protection-wise, Leclerc was behind Leopard 2A5S and M1A2 but similar/somewhat superior to the Challenger 2E overall (somehow). In summary: 1. Leopard 2A5S (+turret front armor particularly good, +ergonomic turret, +good fire control) -> 78.3 % 2. M1A2 Abrams (+ergonomic turret, +good fire control, -fuel thirsty engine) -> 72.95 % 3. Leclerc (+good fire control, +superior mobility, - troublesome autoloader,-cramped interior) -> 71.92 % 4. Challenger 2E (-weak armor/protection compared to Leopard 2 and Abrams, -mediocre firecontrol, -engine/transmission issues,+boiling vessel) -> 69.89 % Source: http://scout-thedeaddistrict.blogspot.de/2017/06/blog-post_17.html
  5. +1 I would love to see damage on tanks. Would be neat if users were allowed to turn that feature on an off and if possible, adjustable as well.
  6. Thanks for clearing that up ! :3
  7. RIP
  8. I think it might be an original that ended up in Australia and was loaned back. I am not sure 100% anymore.
  9. This could be a thread of all kinds of armored vehicles next to eachother.