Welcome to Steelbeasts.com

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

SelvaBR

Members
  • Content count

    38
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About SelvaBR

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 10/04/1990

Personal Information

  • Location
    ParanĂ¡-Brazil
  • Interests
    Milsim; Armored Warfare
  • Occupation
    Lawyer/Social Security Technician

Recent Profile Visitors

533 profile views
  1. Good game folks! Despite that i couldn't operate the OPFOR because i couldn't get in time to join the match. But, as i've predicted, you guys came for the hill near the OBJ1, i'm pretty happy that i could predict that =D Anyway, excited to CO OPFOR again.
  2. BTN Reserve, I13 (1st PLT) or OPFOR without any problems.
  3. Night folks! Just replying to say that this seems interesting and that i'm in!
  4. Players are impatient things :biggrin:
  5. Ha very good! We just need the T=72A and T-72B to get better, TvT matches will go burn!
  6. Nah, i don't think you got the point Koen. We can play redfor normally on multiplayer by just choosing the side, but we can't play redfor normally on singleplayer(practicing) matches without doing some... adjustments before. It would be pretty much cool if we could go redfor just setting us on a playable redfor vehicle and START the game. Anyway, forgive me folks for being so annoying about something that its irrelevant to most of you guys, but i think that it's a simple thing to the devs to do and and i guess that some other members ( Soviet VU? ) would appreciate such detail either, so that's why its in my wish list for 3.0
  7. I keep asking just a few things. -Be able to play with redfor on singleplayer without having to change sides on game. -More non-crewable and crewable eastern vehicles, like the chinese mbts and newer versions of T-72. -More countries on the list so we could make scenarios with syria, china, india etc...
  8. No new playable eastern vehicles
  9. Hability to play with Redfor on singleplayer without having to go BLUE then change to red.
  10. Special weapons platoons with more weapons options instead of only NATO stuff.
  11. More factions as the Syrian army would be cool, crazy about shooting some islamic rebels (FSA).
  12. +1 - The capacity to use "Redfor" as SOLO playable in Singleplayer gaming. - More playable russian/soviet armored vehicles, specially all the T-72 variants and T-90.
  13. LOL! Can't lie i would love that .
  14. As i suspected. Anyway, for example, a T-72M will never penetrates a Leopard 2A5 armor front-armor, it will not bounce but will creates a small hole in the hullarmor, correct, is that what are you saying?. Anyway, this impact makes a noise hehe.
  15. Hello folks, i was reading the wiki and i saw the campaigns, and I got impressed with the content i've found about the Red Tide one. The complexity of rules and the whole level of operation impressed me, was what I was looking for years. So cutting to the point, i would like to known when's going to be the next big H2H campaign?. Can we have an estimate or a guess? Anyone has an idea about the next one already?.