thewood

Putting this here as a thanks to the OP. So he doesn't continue to get pestered.

Everyone? Seems a little ironic to me.

While the internet does what the internet does, using the Bulgarian military website as a single source seems very sketchy. Thats even by internet standards, if there are any. edit: found a second source...https://armedassault.fandom.com/wiki/T-100_Varsuk

I'm not reading into anyone's posts. I just read them. And it is criminal to possess classified information in the US. The only exception is in the process of legitimate news gathering. Its up to DAs and judges to sort out intent for charging.

And Ellsberg leaked to the press. In the US justice system there is a massive distinction between random exposure of classified information and an effort to inform the public through recognized reporting institutions. I am a little taken aback at the level of immaturity around the suggestion on this board. I would expect it from World of Tanks/Warships or the ilk. But always thought the SB community was a little beyond that in its make up. Expectations are now reset.

Do you guys so lack self control that you spout off on political stuff at the mere mention of Ukraine? Can you take it to this thread where a game forum is already wrecked? https://community.battlefront.com/topic/140931-how-hot-is-ukraine-gonna-get/

Just a few years ago, there was ample justification for that line of thinking. A dev's resources are a finite pool and can be very restrictive in the planning of the game/sim. Devs typically chose good graphics vs barely passible simulation or barely passible graphics vs plausible simulation. And the curve on that is constantly shifting based on tool kits/APIs greeting released. There is a third factor and that's motivation. Investor- or market-driven devs are generally pushed for cutting edge graphics with simulation deprioritized to be good enough on launch day. Client-driven devs tend to build more sim-oriented, depending on clients or niche market.

I did the control key search before posting here. I would hope that is SOP for everyone. Never thought of searching party. Tried "side".

I actually use that. I thought there was a hot key you could use in testing that did basically the sane thing. So you could monitor Red units coming in and out of LOS and contact. I guess I mixed it up with something else.

I thought I read on the forum/manual/patch notes that there's a hot key to show all enemy units during the test/execution in the editor.

I didn't mean to attribute it to you...messed up the quote. edit...pointing out that I'm not the only one without an arguement... So here's the argument. I have found esims pretty accommodating in adding things people request that don't contribute one dime to its government business. How many vehicles get added that not a single pro user has used in the last 20-30 years? That statement was uncalled for and almost the definition of a troll.

So a civilized tone only if you agree. I get it.

Is that really all you are reading out of this?

I doubt very much the reboot after reinstall was what fixed it. I rebooted multiple times before uninstalling and reinstalling. I reinstalled then rebooting again. I find the map transfer app fairly finicky. Every now and then I have to kill it in task manager or windows services. It disconnects and won't reconnect or it just won't come up when clicked on. This is across 3-4 different laptops over the years. This time it just wouldn't reconnect no matter what I tried. Only thing I can think of is a recent windows update.