brazen
03-19-2003, 01:38 PM
during my time in the army i never saw service overseas or at a truely operational level. my cousin was a logistics officer(a truck driver ;) ) and was part of new zealands commitment to the east timor peace process but i missed out on this by a matter of months. there is no doubt that if had enlisted 6 months later i would have been involved in foot patrols through the jungle, and possibly in firefights.
what i want to know about is what are peoples thoughts about being commited to active duty in a combat zone? while timor wasn't iraq, it was a dangerous place and several new zealanders(and australians) have lost their lives to ensure their freedom. i am sure that the big factor in the success of the mission their was in many ways due to the fact that australian and new zealand soldiers had the full support of their countries. when new zealands commitment ended early this year there were parades in the streets.
i read that many american soldiers are worried about the fact that this war in iraq is not going to be popular. they are worried about the 'vietnam' syndrome reappearing. that they will be spat on for doing their duty by people that fail to understand the difference being made. but i also see brave faces and comments like ' we don't need the rest of the world, we are america"
and how about your opinions on permanent military bases such as the american commitment in japan and south korea? where there has been negative sentiment expressed towards continued permanent presence(eg at okinawa)
i know several of you have seen service overseas, and some have served in combat. does public opinion matter? does it effect the way you feel about being there?
the mental state of a soldier is vital to the wellbeing of a unit in general. the most well oiled regiment can fall to pieces if its members feel like they are not in the 'right'.
(this thread is not an invitation to start up a discussion on the current political situation in iraq)
(and the emotional state of a force is somewhat difficult to simulate in a computer game... :casstet: imagine trying to attack with a demoralized bunch of m1a1's that just don't feel confident)
what i want to know about is what are peoples thoughts about being commited to active duty in a combat zone? while timor wasn't iraq, it was a dangerous place and several new zealanders(and australians) have lost their lives to ensure their freedom. i am sure that the big factor in the success of the mission their was in many ways due to the fact that australian and new zealand soldiers had the full support of their countries. when new zealands commitment ended early this year there were parades in the streets.
i read that many american soldiers are worried about the fact that this war in iraq is not going to be popular. they are worried about the 'vietnam' syndrome reappearing. that they will be spat on for doing their duty by people that fail to understand the difference being made. but i also see brave faces and comments like ' we don't need the rest of the world, we are america"
and how about your opinions on permanent military bases such as the american commitment in japan and south korea? where there has been negative sentiment expressed towards continued permanent presence(eg at okinawa)
i know several of you have seen service overseas, and some have served in combat. does public opinion matter? does it effect the way you feel about being there?
the mental state of a soldier is vital to the wellbeing of a unit in general. the most well oiled regiment can fall to pieces if its members feel like they are not in the 'right'.
(this thread is not an invitation to start up a discussion on the current political situation in iraq)
(and the emotional state of a force is somewhat difficult to simulate in a computer game... :casstet: imagine trying to attack with a demoralized bunch of m1a1's that just don't feel confident)