Rambler Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Unfortunately not going to be able to make it tomorrow. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D u k e Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Servus, have fun, I have nightshift. cheers D u k e 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colebrook Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 Put me in a t-72 with Rad,or in a M3 if red side is not playable. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted April 30, 2017 Author Share Posted April 30, 2017 Did it work? How was the game? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSe419E Posted April 30, 2017 Share Posted April 30, 2017 The Red FOs were annoyingly fast and accurate. The T-90s were hard to kill at long ranges. I think we should have done better. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted May 1, 2017 Author Share Posted May 1, 2017 can someone post the AAR file? Will there be a video? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted May 1, 2017 Author Share Posted May 1, 2017 Well, finaly , Cimetar got to shoot something :-) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swordsmandk Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 3 hours ago, Grenny said: Well, finaly , Cimetar got to shoot something :-) Find the champagne and let's drink to that. I was beginning to think it was a local problem ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mirzayev Posted May 1, 2017 Share Posted May 1, 2017 We did have less manning that our normal turnout, and I feel like the scenario suffered from it. My recommendation is to have a backup scenario for the Company Level with enablers to serve as alternate scenarios in the event the manning does not support our usual BN (-). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaphod Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 1 hour ago, Mirzayev said: We did have less manning that our normal turnout, and I feel like the scenario suffered from it. My recommendation is to have a backup scenario for the Company Level with enablers to serve as alternate scenarios in the event the manning does not support our usual BN (-). One problem with that it will have to be something that can be planned on the fly 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apocalypse 31 Posted May 2, 2017 Share Posted May 2, 2017 13 minutes ago, Zaphod said: One problem with that it will have to be something that can be planned on the fly That's not a problem for any of the folks who volunteer to lead. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted May 3, 2017 Author Share Posted May 3, 2017 (edited) After checking the AAR, I'd say you did not to bad. But I had hoped that the Drone recce would show you the open Flank that the enemy had...and go for some "bind 'n'strike" action. Instead you took the enemy defence head on (well, It worked to break through) Something in the script did not work as intended. Given the enemy losses, they should have turned and run...but somehow the retreat-if was not triggered. So in that sense, I'd call this battle a Pyrric victory for BLUE. Edited May 3, 2017 by Grenny 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apocalypse 31 Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Grenny said: But I had hoped that the Drone recce would show you the open Flank that the enemy had...and go for some "bind 'n'strike" action. Two reasons why that didn't happen: 1. We lost most of our combat power before we reached the town. D SQDN lost all but 2 tanks in their first engagement and C CO was down to 2 Brads and 2 Tanks by the time we were organizing our assault. 2. The enemy reinforced with a Company of T-90s when we reached the town. I had already committed to a course of action to attack through the woods on the south (weak) side of the town based on the UAS feed. We went south, the enemy went north. At that point, it didnt matter - D SQDN was down to 2 working CV90s. Edit - Drone usage was successful - We were able to destroy the enemy artillery and locate enemy positions without being surprised. That doesn't matter if you lose the gunfight anyway. Edited May 3, 2017 by Apocalypse 31 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.