My wishes for the to-do list.

[DemolitionMan]

*sneaks in, gets out marker, writes on top of THE_LIST*

T-64B

BMP-3

BRM-1K

Replace all remaining SB1 models

[Hedgehog]

When 3D infantry are here:

Foxholes!

With firing step cover from small arms.

(Think very small vehicle emplacement.)

[Ssnake]

The model is in the making already.

[Kethrian]

Playable Challenger...

unfortunately the brits wont be getting SB as they just spent all their £££s bailing out the Irish economy!

[Gibsonm]

I'd rather a Warrior (or CVRT) to go with the CR2 before we ask for a played one.

[RENEGADE-623]

id be happy with the save plan feature back in place

[Tacbat]

Agreed, that would be great to have working again.

[Hedgehog]

The model is in the making already.

That's awesome.

They should actually be a challenge to root out then?

Can I ask if a crewable the M1A2 SEP is in the works?

(I only ask, because we already have the other 2)

[Ssnake]

You can always ask.

:mrgreen:

[Stratos]

Before all I will love the T-72 and M-60 crewable

[Gibsonm]

"and"?

I thought before the T-72 was No.1 on your agenda, so now its slipped to level pegging with the M-60?

[Stratos]

The T-72 is on my top of the list, If I can decide the way Esim must go I will go for the T72 without doubt, but for the future the M60 will be nice too.

[CalAB]

Not to sure just how much it really matters but shouldn't fuel consumption increase when mine plows are attached? I read somewhere that the Abrams burned as much as 25% more fuel when mounted with the plow.

[Ssnake]

In principle you are correct. The question is however whether this matters in the scope of SB Pro's typical scenarios; it's not as if you regularly run out of fuel and have to keep the fuel trucks on standby all the time, so the increased consumption would just be a reduced fuel state at the end of a mission, nothing else.

Of course, once that you run a battlegroup level type of exercise for several days it would normally affect your planning.

[Hunt3r]

I'd love to see an M1A2 SEP made user-crewable, and maybe an M2A3 by the next update or the update after that. Means I don't have to override the gunner to get thermals pointed at something.:biggrin:

[Gibsonm]

Of course, once that you run a battlegroup level type of exercise for several days it would normally affect your planning.

And then you have the next issue of time to fit / remove them and doing so in the simulation.

That presumably would require the ability to do both in a logistic location (just like the current refuel, re arm and repair routines).