Raven434th Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I tried the new terrasim map and noticed while I can drive over/through the low stone walls ,I couln't drive through the orchards of small trees? I mean there just little tiny trees?!?!?...whats up with that?:confused: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ssnake Posted September 1, 2010 Members Share Posted September 1, 2010 The map still is work in progress. Its main point is to illustrate the complexity of terrain that can be generated with Terratools - across several different simulations. IOW, this map must also behave consistently in all diffenrent simulations. If one of the supported simulations doesn't support the collapse of trees you would develop a discrepancy between how the virtual world looks like in one simulation and another.Eventually the trees can be made collapsible as well, and we'll update the map then. For the moment the main purpose of the map is to wait for your feedback whether the frame rates are acceptable. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Considering Framerates:Terrastan Map has about 50% lower FPS then all other maps(20-30 fps vs 40-60).Still good for my maschine.I 3 CPU with 2.93 GHz4 GB Ram2 GB N-Vidia Graphics 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven434th Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 The map still is work in progress. Its main point is to illustrate the complexity of terrain that can be generated with Terratools - across several different simulations. IOW, this map must also behave consistently in all diffenrent simulations. If one of the supported simulations doesn't support the collapse of trees you would develop a discrepancy between how the virtual world looks like in one simulation and another.Eventually the trees can be made collapsible as well, and we'll update the map then. For the moment the main purpose of the map is to wait for your feedback whether the frame rates are acceptable.Yeah about that...1 leo and 2 m2a2's ONLY on the map, looking east across the plains towards the mountains at some buildings in gunner mode... 19 fps.I'd hate to see what happens when a fight goes on.It also took 1 min and 25 seconds to exit from the 3d world to get to the map editor from a test run of only 3 tanks.Not very impressive IMO.I'm running a 2.6 ghz AMD Dual core machine with 3 gig of ram on win7 with a ati 4870 graphics card.....just sayin...edit...strange thing is,when I slew away from those buildings,it jumps up to around 30 FPS 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pongo Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Are there any instructions for installing 2.5xx? I've looked, and cannot find.I have purchased the license, uninstalled my current version, saved parts 2-9 to my desktop, tried to run part 1, which then prompts me that it's missing 'disc 2'. What am I doing wrong? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Retro Posted September 1, 2010 Members Share Posted September 1, 2010 Hm.. are all files (parts 1-9) in the same directory (in your case, the desktop)? Are you sure all parts got downloaded correctly? They should all (except part 9) be 100.000.000 bytes in size IIRC.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pongo Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Thanks for the quick response. I've got it at 812MB for the lot, each part being 97MB.Within that is a Windows Installer Package, which when I run says ''source file not found [...]/SB Pro 2.5X/Data1.cab 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Retro Posted September 1, 2010 Members Share Posted September 1, 2010 There's something wrong.. it's 858MB on my end 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ssnake Posted September 1, 2010 Members Share Posted September 1, 2010 Does the part01.exe run and extract the files without trouble (so you get the error message later when you try to run the Setup program), or does the error message come up during the extraction of the files?If the latter, I suggest to check the exact byte size of each file and download those again that do not match the 100,000,000 Bytes size exactly. You can see the exact file size through each file's properties (right-click...). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pongo Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I try to run the extraction of Pt1, all seems to be going fine and then it says;''Cannot find the next volumeInsert disc with D:/documents and settings [...] CXU35HE7/SBProPE2_538.part2[1].rar '' 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pongo Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I just re-extracted Pt1 for about the 20th time, and suddenly a blue chest of drawers labelled Data11 appeared, and now its working!! Wooo!! Thanks for your help guys 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Volcano Posted September 1, 2010 Moderators Share Posted September 1, 2010 Yeah about that...1 leo and 2 m2a2's ONLY on the map, looking east across the plains towards the mountains at some buildings in gunner mode... 19 fps.I'd hate to see what happens when a fight goes on.It also took 1 min and 25 seconds to exit from the 3d world to get to the map editor from a test run of only 3 tanks.Not very impressive IMO.I'm running a 2.6 ghz AMD Dual core machine with 3 gig of ram on win7 with a ati 4870 graphics card.....just sayin...edit...strange thing is,when I slew away from those buildings,it jumps up to around 30 FPS Well, it doesn't sound like you have a super computer with the setup you describe. That map has a lot of objects on it and visibility (if I had to guess) is very high. Some people around here only get 8 fps on the regular maps and take nearly 5 minutes to load any mission, so 19 fps and 1.5 minutes sounds pretty reasonable since that is the most complicated map that there is. You should of seen it a few months ago when it was getting 2 fps on your setup. Anyway, it will improve in the future I am sure... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ssnake Posted September 1, 2010 Members Share Posted September 1, 2010 I don't think that there's dramatic improvement possible with the computer being the same. Al implemented those optimizations that gave most benefit with relatively little effort, but we know that there are oly little gains to be expected from a lot more work on optimizing the performance under the specific circumstances of a highly complex map.The good news is, as computers are becoming faster and faster it's going to be less of an issue.Raven, the entire map is (compressed) over 340 MBytes large, so of course it takes a while to load. One could think of a number of performance optimizations - but at the price of losing correlation in the terrain, which is actually the point of the whole thing. TerraTools generated maps can have a much higher tree density than the native SB Pro engine can deliver and pretty much any building geometry (while a native SB Pro map is limited to what the object library provides). All that comes at a price. The purpose of including it in SB Pro PE is to figure out if today's PCs are already good enough to run scenarios in this environment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven434th Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Define todays PC and what are you benching your platform against?,are you saying we should be looking at min specs of what?3ghz min?more ram?,what are we looking at to run this map properly??Seems to me its the map that needs tailoring not our pc's.But if thats not going to be the case what should our rigs consist of?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tankenator Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 Define todays PC and what are you benching your platform against?,are you saying we should be looking at min specs of what?3ghz min?more ram?,what are we looking at to run this map properly??Seems to me its the map that needs tailoring not our pc's.But if thats not going to be the case what should our rigs consist of??he is saying that you are determining what the min specs are: you are the lab rat with regard to this map... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted September 1, 2010 Share Posted September 1, 2010 I'd be interested in the feedback on this too as I'm about to submit a bid for a "Battle Lab" with 30 - 40 machines, all of which need to run SB Pro and VBS2 "comfortably" for the next three years (sorry Army doesn't just let me go down the street with my credit card when I think my current machines are sluggish).So I need to buy boxes now that will support our needs into the future (which I guess is a CT(+) / BG (-) on a map similar to the "Terrastan" sample).I'm looking a CAT 6 wiring with a Gigabit switch (and Gigabit network cards) but I suspect network speed isn't going to be the bottleneck. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Volcano Posted September 2, 2010 Moderators Share Posted September 2, 2010 I'd be interested in the feedback on this too as I'm about to submit a bid for a "Battle Lab" with 30 - 40 machines, all of which need to run SB Pro and VBS2 "comfortably" for the next three years (sorry Army doesn't just let me go down the street with my credit card when I think my current machines are sluggish).So I need to buy boxes now that will support our needs into the future (which I guess is a CT(+) / BG (-) on a map similar to the "Terrastan" sample).I'm looking a CAT 6 wiring with a Gigabit switch (and Gigabit network cards) but I suspect network speed isn't going to be the bottleneck.I purchased a PC from "Cyberpower PC", pretty affordable a year ago: an Intel i7 quad core CPU @ 2.93 GHz, 12 Gb RAM, two ATI Radeon HD 4800s using CrossfireX (linked together basically for faster FPS, or use the second for another monitor) and it still runs everything quite comfortably, which is an understatement. I get 60 fps at all times in SB, with about 40 fps on the Terrasim map). It was about... $2,200 or so at the time and is certainly much cheaper now (or better equipment can be had I am sure). Maybe that helps... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven434th Posted September 2, 2010 Share Posted September 2, 2010 Are the 40's range you mention the lowest,or average? One card or two? On a normal map with my single 4870,I'm getting 50-60's as well. 30's on terrastan,except when looking at a small group of buildings,where it drops to mid teens. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.