Jump to content

Leopard 2 turret armor values


Recommended Posts

leopard 2A5 front turret has a steeply angled hollow wedge designed to angle and break a sabot round before it hits the main armour. even a fairly minor angle induced on the penetrator will drastically reduce the

L/D ratio and therefore the penetration of the round.

also, the front turret max LOS thickness is about 1713mm.

the challenger turret armour, has the steepest angle on the front turret of any tank,

its angled backwards 52 degrees, and sideways 27 degrees, giving it nearly 1150mm of LOS thickness to work with.

for comparison, the M1A2 front turret LOS thickness is about 710mm at its thickest.

the M1A2 armour pretty much has the highest thickness efficiency of all these tanks,

getting 950mm out 710mm vs KE.

second place is challenger 2, with 1250mm out of 1150mm

and third place leopard 2 with 1380mm out of over 1700mm of armour.

Edited by dejawolf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunetaly no photos, I have only photos of Leopard 2A4 turret meassured, source is same as infos of M1A1/A2 turret thickness.

BTW If I am not wrong, weld lines on M1 models in SB, are too much to the front, not how they are on real thing, which might cause wrong estimations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure if Paul's estimations were all proper, some of them are considered as wrong these days.

I also made some research on this subject, Dejawolf, you remember STGN? He made a very accurate 3d model of M1A1, to the scale, and his meassures of front armor were also around 900mm. As we know, M1A1's turret is same as M1A2's.

BTW here are some good photos:

Interior:

http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/6249/turret10.jpg

http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/2579/wieam1a1m1a22.jpg

Exterior:

http://merrillaviation.com/images/uploads/SCWS.png

SB model:

http://www.steelbeasts.com/sbforums/sbgallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=16759&g2_serialNumber=1

You can see that on the model, weld lines are too far to the turret front edges, while on real thing armor ends just at GPS and CITV "chimneys".

BTW, CITV hole is smaller, than it's base visible from the outside.

Sorry for lack of photos, I lost whole my archieve due to HDD malfunction few weeks ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Paul's estimations on physical thickness seems to be wrong. Good example is Leopard 2A1/A4.

In his "Armor Basics", Paul writes that "The turret thickness ranges from 1000mm near the corners and 1300mm inthe middle 700mm along the mantlet"

Source: http://pl.scribd.com/doc/6032093/Armor-Basics

While in reality, thickness at 0 degrees from turret longitudinal axis is same all over the place, it is ~800mm.

p1190540q.jpg

This rather shows something is not right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
For leo2A5/6, Chally2, M1A2, is there any ammo currently modeled that can pen that turret front anyway?

Right, the answer is no (in normal circumstances at least). An example of an abnormal circumstance would be the M1A2 sitting at just the right downward angle to make a very close range impact @ 90 degrees by ideal KE ammo, and that would likely result in a penetration through turret front. So normally if any of these tanks were increased by 50mm or 1000mm thicker in the front then it wouldn't make much difference until a further advancement in KE ammunition, I guess.

Jokes aside, is Mr. Lakowski likely to work on new set of estimations?
Anything is possible, but as for how likely? Who knows. Edited by Volcano
typos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For leo2A5/6, Chally2, M1A2, is there any ammo currently modeled that can pen that turret front anyway?

In Steel beasts terms, no.

Highest performing KE round is DM-53 from the L55 with a "Estimation" ;) of 970 mm RHAe at 0 meters.

(So M1A2 is just about possible.)

(I lose more CR2s to hull hits than anything else. If your dancing with anything made later than the mid 80s, you need to very careful with the placing of your tank.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
WARNING - NOOB QUESTION COMING.

I see discussion of slope angles. I thought these were irrelevant these days as KE rounds always 'turned' to penetrate the armour at 90 degrees. So the actual thickness is all that matters. ?

No. The KE penetrator will allways pierce the target...no ricochet exept for extremely shollow angles.

The angle will determinate how much material it has to punch through and how big the sheer forces on the rod will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WARNING - NOOB QUESTION COMING.

I see discussion of slope angles. I thought these were irrelevant these days as KE rounds always 'turned' to penetrate the armour at 90 degrees. So the actual thickness is all that matters. ?

this is wrong. slope angles still matter. the reason is simple. 20mm steel angled at 60 degrees will have a LOS thickness of 40mm.

however it matters less than it used to. back in the days of steel penetrators, slope would offer additional protection to just bare LOS thickness, as the rounds would partially or fully ricochet. so 20mm steel angled at 60 degrees could offer 50-60mm LOS protection.

even today, some older HEAT rounds not shaped like this:

120mm_M830_HEAT-MP-T_455x338_r.png

but more like this:

408_rpg-7_pg7vl.jpg

might offer reduced penetration against sloped armour, or fail to fuse entirely,

due to the placement of the fuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is wrong. slope angles still matter. the reason is simple. 20mm steel angled at 60 degrees will have a LOS thickness of 40mm.

however it matters less than it used to. back in the days of steel penetrators, slope would offer additional protection to just bare LOS thickness, as the rounds would partially or fully ricochet. so 20mm steel angled at 60 degrees could offer 50-60mm LOS protection.

even today, some older HEAT rounds not shaped like this:

120mm_M830_HEAT-MP-T_455x338_r.png

but more like this:

408_rpg-7_pg7vl.jpg

might offer reduced penetration against sloped armour, or fail to fuse entirely,

due to the placement of the fuse.

You take it as a way to increase LOS thicknesses, but don't forget the long term benefit of deviation through multi-layered armors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...