Jump to content

Hedgehog

Members
  • Posts

    6,627
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Hedgehog

  1. That was the last one! Oh woe is us! I have a marsupial, is that any good?
  2. *Prepares Small rodent for sacrifice* Recite my brothers and sisters! The prayer of monopatchism! Our List, Who art in implementation, Hallowed be thye contents, Thye contents be stored, On mass storage, As it is on eSim servers, Forgive us our daily patches, as we forgive those bugs which trespass into features. And crashes to desktop. Update. ***All hail the_List*** (Probably jinxed it now, haven't I?)
  3. Not totally disagreeing here, but I think this should be kept to the same realm as the camera animation editor (Mission editor only) The reason I say this, is back in SB 1 if you took a hit you were bounced back into the Gunner's F1 view. And that was annoying, really annoying, so annoying it stopped with SB 2
  4. I Doubt it, the Sprite flies too high, APS Radar scans just above the horizon like 5 degrees, Tech level isn't Hammser Slammers just yet. Assuming all goes well It'll be no sooner than middle of next week. Tuesday is the Beta Tester feedback deadline. Assuming the team (who are all working like blue arsed flies at the moment) dont find anything, eSim programmers still need to build the update install package etc. This is my educated guess, I do not work for eSim. Do not quote this as gospel.
  5. They're both infected. Personally I'd advocate nuking the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
  6. Hopefully eSim can expand the stable of IR equipped Western armour (And night fighting in general)
  7. Interesting.... Especially the mobile sprite carrier. Who needs tanks when you have killer bees? Thinking ADA is going more and more important in the future.
  8. @Ssnake You're a John Carpenter fan right?
  9. Sounds like they're on the bounce!
  10. Now, how did I know Ssnake would respond thus: ? I am on Ssnake's on this. I mean it's not like it costs anything to shoot a battalions worth of pixeltruppen T-72s does it? That's why they don't let you live fire on Remote Controlled T72s, it would cost too much to replace them. A plywood target is far simpler. Nothing to stop you doing a simulated range period though
  11. Which one is @Ssnake though? The Lieutenant? I know @DarkAngel is Ace 😆 And @TankHunter is Dizzy Also. BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGS!!!! Esim on release day:
  12. Aha! I never knew this! (Or I forgot) The things that hide behind keyboard shortcuts. I'll have to test this out. Everyday is a school day
  13. Of course if you have a fully manned platoon, you can do it the real way. So it's not an SB logic limitation but a deliberate design decsision, choice, ok. Thanks for the input @Ssnake
  14. Yeah but then you'd have to have tank "2" as the platoon leader (in SB) if you want to use a column formation. And then when you use a line or wedge formation the "2" tank would be centre left/right
  15. Yeah but then you'd have to have tank "2" as the platoon leader (in SB) if you want to use a column formation. And then when you use a line or wedge formation the "2" tank would be centre left/right
  16. As a certain Sith Lord once said: "Do it!" 😁 You could then issue an appendix!
  17. I'll go for G12 Maybe we can con....I mean persuade @Major duck for G11?
  18. Well this probably a limitation of SB logic
×
×
  • Create New...