Wahrborg

Can we have a big fight, and then the forum admin delete all the bad-mouthing after we tossed this effing troll out of the community like the garbage he is? pretty please? *sad puppy eyes*

Na sorry, i will be in the sandbox by then, trying to clean up that mess you mexicans did

If Sean doesent show up, and you having problems hosting, i can maybe host it (server verision). Not sure i will be able to play, but i could just host it and let it run. I'll drop by around 18:00 to see if you guys need me and if im still at home by then

M60, one of the early modells without TIS and all that electronic crap! More old-school to SB!

Shotmagnet - Mexican

you fail at internetz posting..again

Ok. for me it doesn't work at all though

Funny you put up this thread Shybird, cuz i just reported that no amphibious vehicles can movi in the water anymore. Obviosly there is somthing wrong at my end - or does anyone elshe having problems with vehicles being unable to move in water

well, there is no such thing as "Danish Pride"

Wellcome back Ren =)

Guess im eating up those word now eh :gen004:

Speaking of Scandinavian armour in Afghanistan - The CV90 saw it's first action ever this weekend in N-E Afghanistan (Norwegian QRF). For the moment i have no more information then that "It was successful". Unfortunately, also this weekend, a Norwegian soldier was killed, and another one was severely wounded, when their Landcruiser hit an IED/Mine.

you MÖP's!

http://www.wineshark.com/battlefield/resources.php Thats the link to the last HtH ol campaign we played. It was done for SB1 by Shotmagnet and the other guys from 29'th, and it was great fun (There are some thoughts, brainstorming and work going on about adapting BFN rules for a new similar campaign for Pro PE)

The 8000 series will run SB at max settings whit no problems what so ever =)

Wahrborg > Stalin-pwnagemachine

pwnt? > Huuuumweeee

Really cool youtube videos you make out of ARRC training sessions Zipulli - keep em comming

Thanks for this site 3Star :luxhello:

Actually, NATO took command over the last parts of Afgh july this summer, before that command was split between NATO in north and center, and US in the south. Now NATO command all of afgh - but heres the tricky part, USA is running their own show next to NATO, and does not in any way have to answer to NATO.. All in all there is alot of strange things like that going on there, such as different nations are there under different mandates an ROE's etc.. kind of an strange situation, where you end up with problems like "we have alot of high-quality troops in country, but only 3 battalions that are allowed by their governments, ROE's etc to be put in the fighting in the south etc" Why swe and other non-NATO are there? NATO is not a closed organization. I think that in pretty much every conflict they have been involved in for the past 20 yrs or so they have welcomed any help from outside they can get. And speaking from the Swedish side, even through we are neutral, there is nothing that holds us from select certain conflicts that we feel we need to be involved whit, as long as it follows some criterias in our constitution. I think it's a similar situation for other non-NATO nations in Afgh and other conflicts as well. Re the transport issue. Im not fully sure exactly how it works, but iirc NATO has a collective transport fleet that is distributed between the different members through a way complicated system, that in the end means that who ever needs transport capabilities wont get it, cuz the other nations that dont need it have it for the moment . As a response to that the EU is planning to build up their own transport abilities by buying a few of this C5 whatever huge planes from the US.. and come up with a new system to distribute transport measures to whoever doesent need it for the moment heh..

No worries, i have no doubt in my mind that a Swedish operation like that would end up in total disaster

I never heard of it, and would be really surprised if they sent 2A5's there. I doubt they have the capasity to support an operation like that from home, if they had, i think we'd have seen them leo's early in OIF.

03:45 at the local pub > When mingers look like beauty queens > Pig hunt! Pig hunt! Pig hunt!

yes > is the easiest word > 03:45 at the local pub