Jump to content

Raven434th

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    150

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Raven434th

  • Birthday 11/15/1963

Personal Information

  • Location
    CANADA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Raven434th's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

10

Reputation

  1. Raven434th
    A32 please...A34 for cav and possibly A33 for higgs
  2. Raven434th
    1/6/A please
  3. Raven434th
    wrong post sorry
  4. Raven434th
    E1 please
  5. Raven434th
    Fine then lets get started shall we? (we can talk about yer paranoid delusions later) Lets talk about your net code and flying tanks and lying AAR's,maybe we can best having to take 7 pages of common sense to convince you to change things?(probably not) but lets try.You wanna make cryptic posts like that then expect to get it right back.
  6. Raven434th
    We won
  7. Raven434th
    This undermines everything we've been discussing in the other threads because they are based on the AAR reports....
  8. Raven434th
    This second set of screenshots that you posted would WOULD NOT HAVE PROMPTED ME TO QUESTION THE DAMAGE MODEL. BUT I DO QUESTION THE VALIDITY OF YOUR AAR'S (esim,not you assassin)
  9. Raven434th
    I'm going by the screenshot...it looks like it hit him squarely in the forehead (after hitting the scope thingy)...if the screenshot is lying so be it. What got hit here??
  10. Raven434th
    agreed...but when we see a turret pop in sb its purpose is to emulate a ammo storage hit which is a known flaw of the T-72 chassis...and other T tanks I believe.
  11. Raven434th
    I never said an armata turret would pop...I said it for the reason the T-72 pops when getting hit in the ammo storage.
  12. Raven434th
    well turrets pop are in sb because turrets pop off in real life due to ammo cook off...thats why you put it there
  13. Raven434th
    Ok doubly so for the A4
  14. Raven434th
    But the A4 round is specifically designed to defeat ERA...that's the whole point of it.
  15. Raven434th
    I really don't think the Russians anticipated the Americians comming up with a solution to counter the Armata so soon. IMO this allows Abrams to use the same tactics as they would against T-80\90, meaning they can engage it frontally if they choose to...at the same ranges. But that's my speculation...not fact.
×
×
  • Create New...