Jump to content

Raven434th

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    158

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Raven434th

  1. Raven434th
    Charlie 11 Gunner please
  2. Raven434th
    B12 please
  3. Raven434th
    A12 please...reserving a spot for higgs as well
  4. Raven434th
    confirmed also....tank you
  5. Raven434th
    Alpha 32 please
  6. Raven434th
    21D please
  7. Raven434th
    C22 please
  8. Raven434th
    Hmm...In that case I'll reserve A31 for cav, I'll take A34 and reserve A32 for higgs
  9. Raven434th
    A32 please...A34 for cav and possibly A33 for higgs
  10. Raven434th
    1/6/A please
  11. Raven434th
    wrong post sorry
  12. Raven434th
    E1 please
  13. Raven434th
    Fine then lets get started shall we? (we can talk about yer paranoid delusions later) Lets talk about your net code and flying tanks and lying AAR's,maybe we can best having to take 7 pages of common sense to convince you to change things?(probably not) but lets try.You wanna make cryptic posts like that then expect to get it right back.
  14. Raven434th
    We won
  15. Raven434th
    This undermines everything we've been discussing in the other threads because they are based on the AAR reports....
  16. Raven434th
    This second set of screenshots that you posted would WOULD NOT HAVE PROMPTED ME TO QUESTION THE DAMAGE MODEL. BUT I DO QUESTION THE VALIDITY OF YOUR AAR'S (esim,not you assassin)
  17. Raven434th
    I'm going by the screenshot...it looks like it hit him squarely in the forehead (after hitting the scope thingy)...if the screenshot is lying so be it. What got hit here??
  18. Raven434th
    agreed...but when we see a turret pop in sb its purpose is to emulate a ammo storage hit which is a known flaw of the T-72 chassis...and other T tanks I believe.
  19. Raven434th
    I never said an armata turret would pop...I said it for the reason the T-72 pops when getting hit in the ammo storage.
  20. Raven434th
    well turrets pop are in sb because turrets pop off in real life due to ammo cook off...thats why you put it there
  21. Raven434th
    Ok doubly so for the A4
  22. Raven434th
    But the A4 round is specifically designed to defeat ERA...that's the whole point of it.
  23. Raven434th
    I really don't think the Russians anticipated the Americians comming up with a solution to counter the Armata so soon. IMO this allows Abrams to use the same tactics as they would against T-80\90, meaning they can engage it frontally if they choose to...at the same ranges. But that's my speculation...not fact.
  24. Raven434th
    If a sabot did get into that area,I would expect the ammo to cook off like a t-72
  25. Raven434th
    One guy tells us there's nothing wrong(volcano),one guy says the aar's are wrong and are inaccurate due to net code(roguesnake),and another guy (ssnake) say they're looking into the damage model issue to improve it and will give us the new A4 round to compensate. WTF?
×
×
  • Create New...