Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by AlphaOneSix

  1. I can make this one it looks like. I'll take a Bradley, Anvil 14. -Cupcake
  2. I'm just waiting to see if I'll be available Sunday, I can't ever tell with how wishy washy our planning cycle is. If available I'll definitely take some mech, but don't count on me.
  3. I thought I was going to miss this, but it looks like I'm available! (I hope I didn't just jinx it.) I'll take B14 in Grenny's platoon. (Cupcake)
  4. Someone posted it in a DCS Facebook group and they said it was from ArmA.
  5. I'm sure it doesn't make a difference, but I voted for option 1 or 2 (can't remember) but my travel has changed and I should be available for Oct. 5th, barring unforeseen work requirements.
  6. It turns out I'm available for this. Please put me on the roster as Cupcake and I'll go in either 4/1/C (it seems undermanned) or if Colebrook ends up as CO, I'd like to take his place in 1/3/A. Thanks!
  7. I'm planning on making this but I won't know for sure until as late as the day of the mission, so I'll wait to request a slot until I know for sure.
  8. I've never played with you guys before, but I'm looking forward to giving it a shot. I'm pretty sure I can make this session, and if it's okay I'd like to man Crusher 11. If that's too much responsibility since I'm new to you guys, I'm willing to be placed where needed. I'm from the U.S. (although currently deployed outside of the U.S. for work) and I'm not affiliated with any online organizations. Also, although my username is AlphaOneSix, that's terribly confusing in-game, so I play online as Cupcake, chosen for my ability to strike terror into the hearts of my foes. Or maybe because I like cupcakes, who knows. If for some reason I can't make it, I'll post here as soon as possible and apologize profusely.
  9. UN and South Africa have the FAL, according to the handy list that Hedgehog posted. In the TGIF from July 28th, the UN soldiers were carrying FAL rifles.
  10. When the video is about Russian Army Aviation, I am not surprised or dismayed to see Mi-28 or Ka-50 footage. I am, however, disappointed to see them use AH-64 footage. That was my point, sorry.
  11. Nice video, even the footage from an AH-64 at 2:45. Hate when they do that, I actually think the Russian stuff is good enough to stand on its own without having to put "fake" footage in.
  12. Well I'm feeling a bit better about my old MacbookPro now... 32 fps with i7-3720QM at 2.6GHz
  13. Even if there was a command line option to disable the 3D world during game startup, that would be a huge help. I think. That gives PE players the option of putting the server in a high bandwidth data center on a virtual server that lacks the ability to render 3D.
  14. The odds of me being able to make this are high enough now that I'm comfortable saying that I'll be able to make it. I would prefer a Leopard (or Leopards, as it were) but I'm quite happy to be placed anywhere you feel needs a body. Thanks!
  15. I'm curious about this as well. I've tossed around the idea of using an Amazon AWS server instance to host games...
  16. I voted for all of them as I can make any of them and I have no particular preference for any specific date. So since I'm one of only two that voted for the 3rd, then I think it's safe to scratch it.
  17. "4.006 changes over the previous patch 4.004 are denoted with blue text"
  18. Okay I had a crash again, although it was AFTER rejoining after one of these "lockups". I rejoined the game in progress (TGIF) and my game crashed as soon as it was unpaused. I was not running the debug version during the first try, but when I rejoined, I was running the debug version. DebugLog and crash dump attached to this post. My video card is an NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with driver version 353.62, although I suspect that my crash on rejoin in this case is not connected to my issue of locking up when switching from the map (2D) view to the 3D world, but hey who knows. Also note that I've been in windowed mode this entire time, I haven't used full screen mode in years. SBProPE64cm.exe.4616.zip DebugLog.zip
  19. I've been having an issue more and more often lately when Steel Beasts will "hang" when switching from a 2D view (map, briefing, etc.) to any 3D view (either by pressing one of the F keys or by double clicking on a unit from the map view). By "hung" I mean that the application becomes unresponsive and Windows marks it as "Not Responding", asking if I'd like to continue waiting for it to respond or close the application. I had this issue before, but in the past, it tended to "resolve" itself after 10 seconds or so. Ever since 4.0 (and 4.004) the problem has only "resolved" on its own once. In about 6 other cases, the game has remained in a hung state (Not Responding, according to Windows) until I finally give up and close the application, usually after 15-20 minutes of waiting. There is a message in my debug logs that repeats over and over and seems to coincide nicely with the time period where the game was not responding: "WARN : Message of type MYMSGID_TANKSTATETOHOST (18) was sent XXX times in the last 5000 ms [FPS=64.47 (66.54 - 59.02)]!" where XXX is usually around 150-250 and the FPS hovers around 60. The above message appears to begin at the time the game stops responding and doesn't stop until I quit the game. In last night's case during TGIF, the game hung and the messages started at approximately 23:33:50 and there are 345 more messages like that up until I quit the game at 23:57:07. I am not pretending that this is a problem with Steel Beasts, or surely it would be happening to more people, but if anyone has any insight into what may be happening, I'm all ears (eyes?). EDIT: I feel compelled to add that the same messages appear in the logs when the issue "resolved" itself in the past, but the line only occurs 3-5 times and the games resumed working normally.
  20. Anybody get the AAR in a place I can download it? Somewhere around the midpoint my game hung (not terribly unusual) and didn't come back after waiting almost 10 minutes (unusual), so I had to quit for the evening.
  21. MANPADS would not have helped the Iraqis much in that case since nearly all of the engagements (at least initially) were at night, and the Iraqis had an incredible lack of night vision devices. They had quite a bit of AAA in the form of ZU-23s ans ZPUs, but as these are visual weapons, the whole night thing made them useless. There were a couple of ZSU-23-4s here and there, but they were by and large destroyed by weapon systems that outranged them. Iraq also had a fairly decent Integrated Air Defense System, but this was one of the highest priorities for most of the early missions (including the very first one of the "air war" by Apaches against several radar sites that opened the way for the first F-117 strikes). Gunships (i.e. AH-64) in SB can be an incredible killer, it just depends on the environment and whether they are properly utilized. Hint: If your AH-64 is within 4-5km of the enemy, it's too close, unless it's infantry with only light weapons, then you should be fine closing to around 1.5-2km.
  • Create New...