Jump to content


Banned Users
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


10 Good

About macieksoft

  • Birthday 08/08/1994

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. OK folks the title, again, was a kind of joke as i used to do. I'd like to know why in SB thermal sight reticles are white? In reality they are light green (at least for Abrams and LAV-25).
  2. Even a lot worse. They will become not the recce vehicles but immune tactical smoke generators that can hide entire convoy from LRF and day sights! I was forced to shoot down one MEDEVAC vehicle because it was making a smokescreen and hiding a convoy.
  3. Looking forward to see turkeys in SB PRO PE. Finally this tank punt gun (CAN ammo for Abrams) would make some sense And yes its happy turkey day. If those turkeys would encounter M1A2 with this huge shotgun punt gun thing they would not be so happy.
  4. And that's good. Nobody wants to get teamkilled by friendly arty just because some brainless (literally brainless) bots called up arty just above your head.
  5. He probably heard the legends (somewhere on this forum) about autoloader that loads gunner's hands into breech. That's the reason why he looks at the autoloader with hes scared face when autoloader works
  6. And just to let you know i voted for AMOS, but i'd also like to vote for some howitzers. Howitzer with working interior, ballistic computer, and ofc some kind of GPS for a spotter team. There is a DAGR in ArmA sries ACE mode. Its rudimentary (has only basic functions). But it helps a lot when creating fire mission. Also there is a Vector laser rangefinder simulation, that supports displaying data for fire corrections! So why not include such complete artillery simulation for SB? I think that following "modules" or rather features could be added to SB: -Mortars (with fully working sights, powder charge simulation (change powder charges), fuse simulation (change between different fuses including timed, proximity, delayed and impact). -MBC for mortars. -Some SPH with working interior and fire control system. Also with multiple fuse settings, different powder charges, possibility and ammunition for self defence direct fire in emergencies. -Some serious rangefinder simulation (including all functions of real device and link to DAGR or other GPS device). -GPS receiver for a spotter team (like DAGR). -And again, guided munitions. I can't wait for a Copperhead! It can do more "magical" things than Copperfield do (AFAIK copperfield never made the tank "disappear" ). And would be nice to have some radio simulation. As this is really missing part when it comes to multiplayer. Something like ACRE for ArmA3 would be really cool and so useful. Also some MBC supports datalink via radio (probably its connected to data socket for radio) but i am not sure how it works.
  7. I am confused, some people tells that Abrams has them and some tells that it has not. I am not sure if this picture really shows spall liners in Abrams, or maybe its from other tank? As you can see the black mat is on the picture while the interior of Abrams is white. And i don't know it. I also don't understand the reason why don't you simply tell me. So just tell me if the Abrams has them and all will be happy. Lock this, yes, but first i'd like to know if there are spall liners in Abrams, and then thread can be locked
  8. I guess that you hate both, immersion and switches. For me power up procedure is something very important. And if its modeled in Centauro and Ulan why not in Abrams? Bradleys are also fuc*** up cause the only switch on turret control power is for FAN. Are you crazy? Fan? Does fan adds something tactical to simulation? Nope. Fan switch is modeled (even when nobody needs it) while turret power is not. Looks like somebody was drunk when making Bradley! And everybody knows that P-51D module for DCS is the about the worst selling module ever. Only few people got it and i don't want to pay for it. But anyway, at least it has a flight model. CV-90/35DK and NL are preatty much the same. Some LEO missing switches for a periscopes i guess (on this control boxes, right side on commander's place). One variant of LEO has one switch working. And they miss a lot of switches on the gunner's control panel. Same thing with Abramses, switches for thermals does not work (Centauro has them working). And why they have working switches for a searchlight but the searchlight is not working at all? Craziest thing i ever seen in any "game". Panel for searchlight works but light don't works at all... So what those switches adding?? Completly nothing. Another thing that is added but does nothing. Instead of adding working switches that controls nothing they could make at least turret power switch! Ssnake please explain me logic behind the switches for searchlight... Because i cannot stop laughing when i thing about this. Pedals? Levers? Gear selector? They do not works in SB, you cannot even see them as there is no driver space modeled in 3D. You cannot even change gears in SB. Even in shitty DCS:P-51D all those small shitts are modeled (even fuse box). And they gave civilian P-51D (without weapons) for free for everybody! And those damn lack of SAFE switch position for tanks. We have SAFE buttons working for Ulan, Pizzarro, CV-90/30 and maybe some other vehicles. Why not in Abrams or LEO? Battle value is serious here. It prevents from accidental firing. It is important (at least until you want to shoot some buddies ass).
  9. Have the M1A2 SEP tanks spall liners in SB? Some ppl saying that SEP Abramses has them IRL and some that they have not. http://www.sadistic.pl/ruskie-tankisty-zazywaja-inchalacji-vt190334.htm Here is a photo (scroll down a bit), guys says that one of the photos are showing spall liners in M1A2 SEP. But in SBwiki they says that LEO has a spall liners but they do not say anything about Abrams. So has the Abrams spall liner or not?
  10. I wonder if there are any serious chances to get playable T-72 with working missiles. Something like T-72B series. As the export M had no such cool things. Also some B variants has ERA, it would make it at least a bit less ducky. Maybe even SOSNA-U sight? Or a PT-91 with new thermal, ERA, LWS and much more? I see a lot of guys (including me) enjoying T-72M1 not because its good (well it is not), but because its... ...Completely different. Giving us B variant would make this shitty tank even more enjoyable
  11. 14 high fieldlity interiors? Lets count them. CV-90/30 CV-90/35 CV-90/40 Ulan Pizzarro Centauro T-72M1 And no LEO and no Abrams because they are missing functions for so many switches! Not even turret power for Abramses... Still all of them missing any kind of radio implementation that is pain in the ass in MP. Also there is no serious driver panel and loader is not crewable. No FBCB2... It would be another abnormal thing as i never seen payware launchers for any sim or game... Javelin still missing features! NVS cooldown, misfires, BIT, focus etc. It sounds like a joke for me as there is no turret power switch for Abramses and for some other vehicles like Bradley. Its like a lightbulb in your room you cannot turn off and you are forced to sleep with light on! No startup procedure possible = missing essential systems!
  12. Before making MLRS please remove map size limit to do not force anybody to place them outside of map in order to use its huge range advantage. I think that MLRS is something with too long range for current state of SB PRO PE. I think that some kinds of howitzers and mortars would be good. Or some old MLRS launchers like BM-21 could also be included as their range is not as big. I'd really like to see some guided artillery rounds. Especially Copperhead laser guided one. Also BONUS could be very useful. I think that making mortar ballistic computer and working mortar sight would be a great thing. Here is one for ArmA 2:
  13. Thats why i said that both things are in fact quite good and serious simulations with lot of advantages and ofc disadvantages. It has a lot of advantages but a price is killing it! Its like the best tank that costs as much as B-2 bomber!
  14. And thinking that everybody in the world is rich American and other people beside America do not counts at all is polite? I don't think so. Many of people on this forum nevermind that its a lot of money for foreign ppl from other countries. As i said few posts before its easy to say but hard to resist. Oh how many times people asked me why. Why i am making firing systems? Why i am amateur electronic? Why the fu** i bought a "calculator" for a 200PLN (it was not really a calculator but a programmable computer from 1995 lol)? Why i am interested in aviation? Just a few examples from my live. As i am not a psychologist so i have no idea. But i know that those things simply makes me happy.
  15. For /30 you don't even have to damage turret. Even with functional turret bug appears when you use joystick.
  • Create New...