venatta

http://www.tank-net.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=40677&page=1 On tanknet thread says that Leo 2A7 gunner will be using old WBG-X instead of new ATTICA because of limited budget.

Unlucky M1A2SEP got disabled and destroyed by 100mm HVAP fired from T-55, which penetrated the GAS.

K2 was designed to provide adequate protection from frontal arc of 45 degrees, instead of 60. During the development stage, some engineers doubted the need of thick turret side armor covering 45-60 degrees. After some research it showed that the probability of hit in those areas were quite low, so they decided to eliminate some armor to reduce the weight.

K1/K1A1/K1A2 and K2 Black Panther would be great.

What are the ranges for the penetration values in SB wiki Ammunition page? For example 410mm RHAe for M735 doesn't seem to make sense unless it is measured at 0m.

Uh actually I did not "tackle" you that the armor protection of the M1A1 HA is same as the M1A1 HC. I clearly stated that the protection levels of the M1A1 HA and HC are different. But what I argued was that your reference is not suitable to backup your argument.

http://blog.naver.com/unmp/70170703185 Well, as mentioned during the National Assembly inspection, K2 Black Panther has 1.85 times better protection in front and 1.1 times better in side than K1. As K1 can withstand RPG-7 with its turret side armor. Also additional ERAs can be attached on the turret side, and it can withstand not only RPGs but also HEAT round fired from XXXmm tank gun with the penetration of XXXmm. K2's turret side protection is not as weak as you think.