-
Posts
682 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
Downloads
Articles
Posts posted by ashdivay
-
-
why are these upgrades never straightforward. Thanks to all for providing "How to info"
0 -
-
-
-
Nice work!
0 -
On 10/1/2020 at 11:13 PM, Ssnake said:
The point of this thread is to let everybody voice his preferences. That, if multiple people express their wishes, some of them may be contradictory, is pretty much a given. The community is not a hive mind. Insofar I find this critique unfair, as it juxtaposes different opinions from different people as if they were coming from a single body. That simply isn't the case.
Also, I think I made clear that eSim is working on an entirely new engine that will no longer use DirectX 9, that an explicit and major goal of this engine is to separate the render loop from the simulation loop, and as a natural consequence of that a server that doesn't need a graphics card in order to host a session appears quite feasible, possibly via command line switch. Insofar we'll be able to maintain established hosting procedures as well as allowing people with a dedicated gaming server to run SB Pro without the need for a graphics card.
Everybody wins.
Can we move on now, please?
You made me happy , now just take my money and make it happen. Just kidding.
Thanks for the info.
0 -
6 minutes ago, Gibsonm said:
Well how about we make that optional?
Some / many use the server application, but participate as well, rather than running two instances (1 x server and 1 x client) on the same machine.
Yes if there was a way to disable the need for GPU before starting a server. It will give flexibility.
But could be more complex to implement.
Non-GPU dedicated version is for pure server client environment where raw power of processor and large amount of ram could be utilized.
But since SB can only use single thread its really not relevant.
It would also be useful for someone who wants to host SB session with server living on a cloud platform such as google , AWS etc. We can add a gpu there but it cost lot more.
It would be nice to have non-gpu version of exe just for scenario like that.
I can dream for now.
0 -
On 9/28/2020 at 1:56 PM, Major duck said:
a multi treaded/Multicore Client/server so we can run bigger scenarios (and actually use more then 1 core) without trouble and an import function to EU 2 meter laser maps.
And my greatest wish a M41 Dk1
MD
+++1 on that.
And add - No 3D graphics - Dedicated Server exe. So we can run these on servers without needing GPU.
0 -
I don't know how i missed this.
This is amazing, thank you.
0 -
54 minutes ago, Rotareneg said:
You can dig vehicle emplacements with engineering vehicles now.
When was that added ?
0 -
i guess the question i would ask if eSimGames would allow us to transfer the license to smaller dongle if we bought one ?
Thoughts +Snake ??
0 -
24 minutes ago, Nike-Ajax said:
IF someone theoretically was clumsy and almost broke it ... could one then get a new dongle ... ?
Good question.
0 -
Is there a compact or more portable version of the dongle.
I almost broke mine as it sticks out and i hit it with my leg.
0 -
Ability to build ditches and emplacements while in game. Sorry if it exists already. I was thinking it would be nice to have.
0 -
Indian WhAP8x8 Various prototypes
New turret
With BMP2 Turret
0 -
-
BUMP !
0 -
Yep ! Who knew he use to ride vespa's
0 -
-
Why no pre-order like Steam does ?
Get with the times dude !
0 -
Tell me god dammit !
I want it bad.
0 -
117 hours ago, Volcano said:
Convoy Ops 01-Multiside-4023
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to be the first CO from Blue/Green side to win this mission.
0 -
-
Jumping in late for this,
But one thing that would be great is a dedicated server file which does not render graphics on the server.
this would enable some of us to then host sb on a AWS or google cloud instance like i do for ARMA 3.
And i will admit i dont know how hard or easy it would be to implement and make a dedicated server for SB.
@Ssnake ??
0
SB Pro PE 4.250 Posted
in General Discussion
Posted
I know; that's why I wanted to clarify my pro-nouns just for your benefit.
As for my previous comment of the upgrades not being straightforward, this is my fault I did not take the time to read anything and assumed that this upgrade would continue the past trend of being overly complicated. I admit (after reading a few notes) I was wrong.
Truly credit is due for you and your team for your hard work, after all these years its finally simple to use.
Thank you