Jump to content

apelles

Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by apelles

  1. I think you still not get it. The developers not ignore you. Just you don't give any picture, AAR, technical specification, what are your opinion is based. No numbers, not technical manuals. Are you handle Challanger 2s in real life? Or T-90S? You know someone who does? Or your complain based on feeling?
  2. The Volvo car in the game is underpowered. Because i like it, i know. Don't bullshitting with me. Make it right.
  3. I know it. Just i feel that more important than Jtac and visual models of CAS aircraft. Of course this is only a personal opinion. I could live with the developers decision. :-)
  4. For example active IR or xenon searchlights. Illumination shells for artillery. edit: and some moon(star)light
  5. And he has russian and hungarian technical manuals and crews who has been operated for years. The samsim is the real stuff for air defense. Much like Steel beast for armored warfare. Don't underestime it. Sorry Hedgehog i adressed this to Gibson. :-) http://simhq.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/3640138/1/ZSU-23-4V1_Shilka
  6. I voting for fully implemented night fighting capabilities.
  7. Is there any good source on late model M-60-n in Gulf war? Was it in fight? How it perform?
  8. (Offtopic): And and the following title (WW1C) is late war or mid war campaign? Maybe eastern front? I will not tell anyone. :-)
  9. I know that is not comforting, but in in my country, we have an "Air force" of 16 leased swedish light fighter, the army without any combat helicopter. We have 15 preserved T-72M1 "tank", the rest is given away to "New Iraq". The whole army not bigger than a medium infantry division in the USA, and still half of this is clerk. While we have more generals than Poland. However the politicians have armored Audis and State employee chauffeurs. What a dumbfuck country is mine?
  10. Thanks Froggy. I feel myself like an idiot. I'm done with questions till 2015.
  11. I have the same problem with Leo 1A5 and Leo 2A4. On the CCP screen i switch to Manual mode, but i can't type the range. I won't find anything in the manual and the wiki about it.
  12. The T-72M4 and T-72 Turms is identical?
  13. Strange, i find it smooth. Not on the Leo or M1 level but i like it.
  14. The T-72 Turms really has the same FCS like the Centauro? Or there is some differences?
  15. Of course Claudia Schiffer... But really Chieftain early and late model... Or some more Korean map... Or korean K1 or K2 (:-) i know, i know it's not much chance) M47-M48 Patton, T55 early.
  16. I made a small scenario with T-62 opposing Centurions in night. I think the T-62 has some advantage due to the rudimentary night sight. But on the contrary the centurions pick me out over 3000-3200 meter in 3% illumination while i don't see even the muzzle flash on the night sights. The simulated Centurions has TIS? In the editor can be switched off? Damaged or something. The NVG is only the night vision googles of the commander?
  17. Great! Thanks! This was the fastest problem solving in the content wish list. :-D
  18. I would like to ask a little feature. It would be possible changing the soundset matching the vehicle? For example russian for t-72 (spanish for Leo2E, german for Leo2A6, danish for Leo2A5DK) but the text, descriptions, orders and the menus remaining english? I like the realistic sound, however i like understand too, whats going on. :-)
  19. I looked around in my new 3.011s (yikes) mission editor and i ran in the damage section of the Leo2A5 the searchlight option. In the future, this will be simulated? If the answer is yes, the russian active IR light will be simulated too? Another question: The active IR light is visible in the thermal sights? So basically its usage is a disadvantege?
  20. Huh, thanks for the opinions. Where i can read in detail on the web or book about Challenger 1? It's a cool machine for me, not the best, but cool. Like Leo 2A4 and T-55. :cool3: I read a debate in another tread about how bad this, or how bad that. But hey it's a cool sim. It's fun trying simulate cold war warmachines. Fun, nothing to quarrel about simulated tanks. I like the old Leo even if my ass is burned in hundred times by M1A2s. Sorry for the another off topic paragraph...
  21. A bit off question. What kind of operation mode has the FCS of the Challenger 1? Like the Australian Leopard1AS? Or more like the C2? I read somewhere that one Challenger 1 holds the record of the longest tank kill in the Desert Storm. It has an excellent optics? A superb FCS? Or just luck?
×
×
  • Create New...