Jump to content

Major duck

Members
  • Posts

    1,839
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Major duck

  1. AAR The file is too big too upload here so off to Google https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X0hUTN_KqGdqDdtIogqwWcTHypZXXsaC/view?usp=sharing MD
  2. For those that dont use RAR as a packer just download this folder and put it into your Map folder You can find where that is by going to Main menu then Options then Filepaths you might need to unhide that folder as Esim for some not so obvious reason have chosen to hide it and then show where it is in the main menu that just dossent make sense. Then copy paste this folder into the "Map Package" folder and restart Sb https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1fAWRnxkcDqplxAnE8v2VNgKzhtldsoF-?usp=sharing There is almost no difference in size between the packed file and my unpacked file and you will download from Google which usually is much faster then SB forums MD
  3. Year we never upgraded the drivetrain or engine which meant that by 1980es they where pretty worn out and we stopped using them in 1999. We called them scrammelturions internally as is shown by one of the exercises i was on, i was the FO for a SQN (COY) they started out with 10 Tanks (3x3 plus CO which during the cold war was standard) by midday on the first day only the COs tank was still running all the rest where broken down. The Danish Division in the Danish German Corps had an Anti tank BTN with 50 Centurions (84mm later 105mm) when they where mobilized and on exercise they sometimes where as low as 5-10 or less running during most of the exercise. But don't misunderstand me all the tankers said that it was shooting better then even the Leopard 1A5 it was just they had run since 1953 until 1999 without receiving upgrades on the drivetrain or engine at all and there where no spare parts for the drive train at all i saw mechanics scavenge old tanks used as target for parts of the drive train (Tracks, shock absorbers, road wheels etc...) at that time it was decades since it had been in production so no sources for parts. MD
  4. Which by the way is the same Range finder , Thermic sight and Ballistic computer as on the German Leopard 1 The 84/105 was equipped with a Ranging gun as far as i know and i quote "The main gun was aimed using a coaxially mounted .50-caliber machine gun that fired tracers in three-round bursts up to a range of 1,968 yards. The gunner watched the tracer rounds through a periscope gun sight and set the range on a drum device linked to the main gun." I might be wrong cause it was even before my time. So Mark you are both right and wrong. That's why i specifically asked for 3 different versions of the Danish ones and 2 of the Swedish ones so the ones designing the scen have a choice. And since its already in the game and since the whole Range finder , Thermic sight and Ballistic computer was taken from the same source and had identical performance it should be at least partly/Some copy paste in the code. I seem to remember that there might be a limitation with the ranging MG. Also could we try to get the speed of the centurion right i know it could only drive 35 kmh but it could do so all over the place and we had trouble as FOs in our M113 to keep up as soon as we were of the road. And i haven't even taken the speed of the Israeli upgraded ones into account that might also be relevant. MD
  5. M41DK1 M41 Centurion Mk V (84mm / 20 Pounder)) Centurion Mk V, 2 (105mm L7) Centurion Mk V, 2 DK (105 L7 with laser and Thermic) Strv 102 Strv 104 M113A2 Mk I DK Strv 103C Playable AT Weapons Playable Infantry Overhaul of Artillery Ability to see why your guns aren't firing Ability to designate specific Guns to specific units WP rounds with fire effect + smoke (Quick smoke) HC rounds (Slow smoke) GPS rounds / Fuzes A Military protractor for Mils and a compass that works in map (F5) and HUD from INF and TC (F7) An Caesar / Atmos 2000 type Gun/Howitzer A playable Leclerc tank i don't need the interior but sights would be good. A playable Chieftain tank i don't need the interior but sights would be good. Ability to port camo/Uniforms etc... with scenario file so everybody look at the same sight. Ability to "Paint" Numbers and Unit Crests with the scenario file so everybody look at the same sight. and you can see on the outside that its the co in front of you etc... More buildings with a lot more variety colors masonry etc... or the ability to import them and send them with the map to others . K2PL K2 Leopard 2A7 (I know we don't get it ever but this is a wish list after all) Leopard 2A8 (I know we don't get it ever but this is a wish list after all) CV9035DK upgraded like planned (With Spike and most of the suite from Mk4) CV9035NL as upgraded CV90 Mk4 Challenger 3 Piranha 5 with Skyranger Turret This turret is going to see widespread use in NATO as Denmark, Hungary, and Germany already have ordered it with more in the pipeline. Puls MLRS The reason for all the Centurions is that its very popular in our Multiplayer games but the current version issent "right" no way to measure distance etc.... All the new stuff is because in the last 2 years there has been an explosion in development of new stuff The other old stuff is to supplement the Centurions The Artillery is too fix and or implement what is wrong or should be there already (See below) The infantry is because whether we like infantry or not we cant have one without the other and i know people that teach on the military version that use is as a tool to teach combined arms not just a Tank crew trainer , year i have even seen Snake post videos from Spanish BDE exercises , i have seen plenty of movies and pics from Danish combined arms exercises in the Tactical trainer in Oxbøl. That is as much damage as i can do in one night at my job with nothing to do. MD
  6. Also to move people around between tanks, Its pretty annoying if a tank have a dead/Wounded driver and another have some other casualties and you cant make them jump across so there is a full crew and it would also be nice to be able to sneak up over the ridge with the TC to see if any badies are on the other side of the Ridge. I also totally agree with Grenny/Ronin especially about the assigning fires. You cant say this Battery support this unit and this for the MECH etc....
  7. AAR https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tPn8PbmK-AOX80mxnCsZqC-IFve3oKPx/view?usp=sharing Opfor AAR https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S3PoIk0Q59VAhcABnl2b9G4HzhU_TbPz/view?usp=sharing
  8. For all the New guys velcome We will be on Kanium TS3 to setup your comms for the mission 1 hour before game start For all Coy commanders and new Platoon Leaders remember you need 2 Channels setup. Everyone remember to test if you have the map etc... by downloading the test scenario (In the bottom of the first post) As there will be full platoons with gunners we need to setup with vehicles so people need to be there early so they can setup their Platoon and intercom freqs What that means is that you will have to communicate on the Platoon freqs and sit in each individual vehicle. We are now up to 27 to 29 people if i count correctly (I have failed before so i might) 🙄 TS3 Comms setup guide https://docs.google.com/document/d/14oDdWYFaKK3JR4gnWb8wy5OfsUwPCZsNwfvOVq5QP-g/edit?usp=sharing
  9. I can take him but i think i saw that Phan has already offered but he will have a spot with either of us. MD
  10. For all the New guys we will be on Kanium TS3 to setup your comms for the mission 1 hour before game start For all Coy commanders and new Platoon Leaders remember you need 2 Channels setup. Everyone remember to test if you have the map etc... by downloading the test scenario (In the bottom of the first post) TS3 Comms setup guide https://docs.google.com/document/d/14oDdWYFaKK3JR4gnWb8wy5OfsUwPCZsNwfvOVq5QP-g/edit?usp=sharing
  11. Same back at you. You need to get your GF to play SB then you don't have so many scheduling conflicts. 😋 Have a nice x-mas and and Happy new year. We will see you on the other side
  12. If you can be at Kanium TS3 1 hour before start time so i can set you up with coms etc... Best regards MD
  13. Year CAV but we always ask nicely and even congratulate you your are our Hero
  14. No you come with accusations but no arguments and i also said that Apoc wassent "though to be fair its not the most elegant delivery". I gave reasons for agreeing/disagreeing with some of the stuff and i also gave you what i think is the reasoning behind Snakes argument which i think is a civiliased way of communicating as i don't just fling accusations around i try to argue for what and why. I think i will end here as this lead no further. Best Regards MD
  15. Can we please keep a tone here that keep it civiliased please. And i must admit that this kind of also what i get out of the answers from Snake. But that is also because Snake has told us earlier that he uses that specific "Hand of God" or Dm functionality to differentiate between versions he wants to make sure that the countries that buys the Pro or military version don't just buy a lot of the cheaper Pro Pe version and use those as a much cheaper substitute if the PE version can do the same thing, so i am just trying to get a function that tries to negate the worst of that policy for us Pro Pe users. So year i understand where Apoc is coming from, though to be fair its not the most elegant delivery 😉 I could also come up with a lot of other arguments but i think we as usual can agree to disagree and at this point i don't see much hope of getting anywhere further its a shame because i really like your sim.
×
×
  • Create New...