Jump to content

Bond_Villian

Members
  • Content Count

    1,114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Bond_Villian

  • Rank
    Junior Member
  • Birthday 03/13/1980

Personal Information

  • Location
    Perth WA Aus
  • Occupation
    Landscape Gardener

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Nice one, maybe seeya online sometime... if youre into that kind of thing
  2. @IamKirk Seems you have it figured out, but i will say that in my experience, messing around with any of the road leveling/raising features tends to be very time and patience intensive. Also results in very large files, and often hangs the software or crashes my PC. For the issue of a bridge not meeting the road neatly i would agree that shifting the road and bridge somewhere else is a much better idea. I tend to look at the terrain in 3D view and find a spot where the ground either side of the water is at a gentle slope and the same height on both sides. Also, when replacing an unsatisfactory bridge, i would recommend against 'placing' bridges, and find it best to: 1) delete the bridge 2) move the roads to a better location (you will have a gap in the road now) 3) rejoin/merge the roads 4) in the edit menu at top of page select 'bridge roads' 5) take a look in the 3D world and repeat if needed And another thing! The terrain in the map editor doesnt always look how it does in the sce editor, which may be different again to what you see when actually playing the scenario. So in the case of a bridge and road not being neat; if its only a minor misalignment that doesnt look like it will stop units from driving over the bridge (vehicles are surprisingly tolerant of big chunks of concrete with reo-bar poking out of it, it looks worse than it is usually)- dont worry about it.
  3. This gets played at TGIF occasionally http://www.steelbeasts.com/sbwiki/index.php?title=Battlezone
  4. GG, an interesting concept- i like the changes too. A thought on the sce; it would be helpful for the CO if artillery was available to all, as opposed to FO only (unless its deliberately that way for design reasons, of course).
  5. This suggests that the published map needs to be uploaded to this site.
  6. ...you would prefer infantry models dont show weapons?
  7. I though they both have the same options? Defend Guard Hold Suppress Stay None ? Dark may be alluding to some programming difficulty related to associated options available to infantry such as posture, building floor level, occupy or dont occupy buildings etc.
  8. You're forgetting the mi 2 & 4... these ugly bastards would fit right in here
  9. Ctrl+c to check and modify all bindings. This can be accessed during the execution phase (gameplay) too
×
×
  • Create New...