Jump to content

Red2112

Members
  • Content Count

    1,156
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Red2112

  1. Red2112

    Tactical FPS

    So damn promising! Red
  2. Red2112

    Tactical FPS

    Police 1013, dev log... Red
  3. Red2112

    Wargames

    I wont rate it yet as it´s on EA, but overall my view is below... https://www.steelbeasts.com/topic/12086-tactical-fps/?page=8 I don´t find this as a "wargame", thus better suited as "tactical FPS". Red
  4. Red2112

    Wargames

    Playing Jane´s Fleet Command, single mission "Chinese Special Forces"... Red
  5. Red2112

    Wargames

    Having a look at the 4th edition of the Command at Sea rules system by The Admiralty Trilogy Group, published by Clash of Arms... Red
  6. Red2112

    Wargames

    No Enemies Here (NEH) first anniversary, 52 shows! News, unboxings, reviews and pre-releases every Saturday... Red
  7. Red2112

    Tactical FPS

    Glad you went for it @Marko, I think you´ll like it. Iam having fun with it although the controls need some getting used to, but overall great fun, and the new map and tanks look great! Can´t wait for the campaign More goodies, stay tuned... Iron Front/Desert Rats mod to be out this month: Red
  8. Red2112

    Tactical FPS

    Thanks @Jaguar, although I personally don´t have a VR set, but seems cool to be able to VR in a tank indeed. IL-2 Tank Crew has received a new update (v3.012) which includes a new map (Prokhorovka), and two new tanks, Sherman M4A2 and PzKpfw.III Ausf. M. More info in the link below... https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/12826-game-updates/?page=2&tab=comments#comment-744096 Red
  9. Red2112

    Wargames

    Game footage of the upcoming Steel Division 2... Red
  10. Iam talking about serious people/gamers, not some kids getting there kicks. We all know whats out there, and even with SB there´s who can ruin a match or more, so no game is extent of bad manners or someones "lousy day" at work. Red
  11. Most simulations can be played any way you want to. There´s no real right or wrong way of doing so. There´s quite alot of descusions out there where devs admit that although they intended there game to be played in a certain way, people have totally made there own way of playing it. How you "sim" is up to you, whether you want to plan, train or go 70% by the book, and I say 70% because a sim is a tool, you wont be doing a RL 100%, without saying that for starters you don´t have ALL the hardware a tank/airplane/submarine or what ever in front of you. You sim for rutines, workflows, communications, strategies, awarness, team cohesion, and other situations/enviorments/issues for your benefit/practise, but your not obligated to do so. You may enjoy it more or less, achieve a excelent outcome or not, but again there´s no wrong or right because nothing is set in stone. Even with all the effort to planning, RL know how (mil) and what have you, things still can go wrong, or someone will go his/her own way (unrealisticly) which again brings up the same point, "is this right"? Each one has there own goal, if any, and there´s no better then other, just different. If one understands that, then there´s a bunch of ways to enjoy these "tools" (sims). Red
  12. Red2112

    Wargames

    Unboxing Flashpoint: Golan by Mark Herman and Victory Games (1991)... Red
  13. Red2112

    Wargames

    Fist Full of TOWS... Red
  14. Yes Iam sure of that Ssnake, and Iam not saying you are not doing that, but not everybody who buys SBProPE jumps in the forum, or knows anything about that, or knows they should ask you about getting a PE server version. Some of us are used to doing some research and visit forums for example, but unfortunately that´s not the case for all. Yeah, I know, people should read the manual and all that, but they don´t and go the easy way, in other words "plug and play". Just thought that giving this option straight out of the box, might encourage more followers now with the new map/terrain engine coming up. With regards to PE, well that´s what it is Gibson, a "personal edition", although the main target customers are military for the Pro edition. As you said, "if you can afford it" which is not the case for most of us, which means the PE version should be looked at and played with different eyes/attitude because one can expect just about anybody buying the PE version. Another thing is how it should be played, or intended to be played, which is a whole different story.
  15. I think that having seperate installers (maps/terrain - core game) is a good Idea, mainly because as Ssnake stated, you wont have to re-install everything when you upgrade, or whatever changes could effect the core game. Prepar3d (Lockheed Martin) flight sim has a similar structure in it´s latest versions, basically it uses three different installers, "Client", "Content" and "Scenery". Depending on what has been updated and/or what you are interested in updating, you choose what to download/update. As for the comments above with regards to MP, I would prefer a bigger MP count/host as default then the present one, with out the need of asking for anything special. Say like a max of 18-20 players for someone that would/can host it. At present it´s a bit limited IMHO. In order words, for the PE version to be able to host a 18-20 player match. Red
  16. Red2112

    Tactical FPS

    Yeap! Pricing a bit out of hand for the alpha version (August 2019) but will see. If it turns out as good as it looks, then Iam willing to pay! Ready or Not home site: https://voidinteractive.net/#pre-order Red
×
×
  • Create New...