Jump to content

Red2112

Members
  • Content Count

    1,539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Red2112


  1. 17 hours ago, Apocalypse 31 said:

    I'm not digging the WW2 setting and it looks a little rough on the eyes, but that feature list is impressive.

     

     

    Yes the WW2 topic is quite burnt IMHO, but again that´s what sell´s for mainstream I guess.

     

    I don´t have the game yet, but I like what I see, even though it is a bit rough as you stated.  As mentioned in the preview, I really like the fact that the OPFOR retreats when overunned!  It´s nice to see the AI act like that.  I think the game is open for alot of improvements, and really hope it does so.  I good welcome to the gener 👍

     

    BTW, it seems they are a Canadian based company:

    https://decisiveactiongames.com/

     

     

    Red


  2. 1 hour ago, stormrider_sp said:

    I have a few garments from Helikon. I love their UTP (Urban) trousers, very comfortable and durable. Haven't tried their backpacks tho; mine is a First Tactical Half Day pack and I absolutely love it, even if its a bit a heavy.

     

    Tomorrow this should arrive...

     

    In Coyote color

     

    and this also in Coyote color...

     

    Also have there Poncho which I use as a Tarp too.

     

    Plan to get there Swagman Roll Poncho which you can hook up to there poncho as a liner...

     

     


  3. Thanks for the update on GR Apoc 👍

     

    The future looks promising then. Especially if we can host our own server without the need of a dedicated client server as now.  That waist harness looks sick! Nice stuff.  I recently got two tactical bags (EDC´s) from Helikon-Tex (Poland) for this summer.

     

    Played Nine to Five today as Alpha test team.  Can be very good IMHO, the 3 team vs 3 team makes it slow and with the need to comms among each other, even if you don´t know the other two players.  You are only a fireteam of three, so if anyone decides to go solo, the whole phase goes down the drain!  I think it´s a great concept.  Makes it quite challenging and tactical, with a big amount of a competitive role to the overall gameplay.  Can´t say much more then that...

     

    Red

     

     


  4. I think Ssnake has a very valid point there, apart from his hands-on experience.  As he stated, as a new team/project, and from the looks of it (and I don´t mean graphically), they don´t have a investor, or BIG money behind the project.  Actually, they only have a very modest Patreon subscription to help out in the project. There´s no goal set kickstarter campaign like alot of other projects.  With that said, I get a feeling of a modest, passionate project with good intentions.  They seem to be on the right track, and as Neils stated, you don´t need fancy interiors to show off you´re intentions.  In it´s basic form, it´s fun and get´s the job done, and to me it dosent feel arcadey.  Turret speed could be better, but hey it´s WIP.

     

    Could be wrong with all this, as in everything in life, but as is, you have a full functional demo with plenty to do/try.  Which is alot more then some other EA games will give you.  It´s a very early alpha, and sure it could be better, but aagain, as it is, it beats alot of EA games on Steam with a price tag on them.

     

    The core of the game, which is what the demo shows, is fun as it is, and it´s alot more realistic (to a degree in it´s WIP mode), then some of the full fleshed tank games out there. At least for me...

     

    To be clear, IMHO there is no game/sim that can compare to SB Pro PE in it´s gener, but if I wanted a change for awhile, I would be happy with something in the line of GHPC.


  5. 9 hours ago, Apocalypse 31 said:

    1. That RvS Mod looks amazing.

     

    2. The ground branch roadmap seems underwhelming

     

    3. Ready or Not doesn't look good. At all.

     

    1. I agree (wish it would have been co-op too).

    2. I will belive it when done!  Last update was, I can´t remember! So quite so time ago.  There not being to productive, just tweaking, changing things that are already done (UI ect.), and adding more guns and such.  Two new maps that are empty, but no signs of how a single mission will be, or a campaign for that matter!

    3. What is shown looks poor, but can´t say much till we see more.


  6. It´s not that bad, even considering it´s in alpha.  I have been messing with it for awhile, and to be honest, If I had to choose (aside from SB), any of the tank games now available, I would choose this.  It´s sort of like DCS Combined Arms while in tank view.  You have a 3rd. person view, a Commander view, gunner view, and if available a 2nd aux gunner view. You do have to lase and/or lead-lase, which that I know of you don´t need to do in World of Wussy´s, or Turdthunder.

     

    Come on guys, it´s a tank game with good intentions, be nice! 😉

     

    Hey it´s a free demo, download it and try it, easy as that...

     

    Red-acted


  7. On 5/14/2020 at 8:53 AM, Ssnake said:

    With their attitude, they would make fine members of the eSim Games team. But, of course, they have their own project now.

    That´s very nice! Iam sure they would be proud to hear/read that, and who knows what the future could bring. 😎

     

    For Patreon users:

    https://www.patreon.com/GunnerHEATPC

     

     

     

    Red


  8. 1 hour ago, Ingolf said:

    Ready or not seems like a waste to me.

    I need a 3D-shooter that is considering every meter I take,,, :)

    Like Raven shield. Love it. Thanks for posting the updates, Red!

    My pleasure 👍

     

    With Ready or Not, I hope the campaign is better. PvE/Coop might be better, who knows, but PvP is what it is as in most of these games.

     

    Red

×
×
  • Create New...