Jump to content

pumagreen

Members
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by pumagreen

  1. 8 hours ago, jena73 said:

    I hope only in a better fps and a smooth graphics… i have SB frm 2016…… now is too old the engine……i think about ghpc…

    I'm a Patreon supporter for GHPC and it's going to be years before it plays as good as steel beasts. It'll never match the scope of steel beasts either. It is pretty though, I'll give it that. My computer is half as powerful as yours and plays steel beasts great. With the graphics turned up pretty good. 

  2. I doubt loaders machine guns will be playable anytime soon. There's not a lot of training value from that. They would only be doing that for civilian market and they sound pretty busy setting up for the new engine.  

  3. I was a brand new private driving an Abrams at NTC. Was night time just driving along and the tank went sideways. So I stop and the tank commander looks then yelled some nonsense and tells me to back up. 

     

    Turns out I ran over a pop up target. Did 8 thousand dollars worth of damage. 

  4. Russian thermals and sights are always behind the West. Overall it does seem like a solid tank though. Has pretty much all the modern features a modern tank needs. It can fire a missile from the main gun that has a 5km range supposably. How well they work I'm not sure. Someone else will need to fill me in. I wouldn't say the T-90M is superior to the newest Abrams, but it might be on par with it. Hopefully we never find out. 

  5. If your PC can handle cranking up the graphics they are pretty good honestly. You just gotta remember this is a simulator not a game. The people that make it consider the eye candy low on the priority list. You really don't need super high frame rates, anything above 25 FPS while shooting is fine really. 

×
×
  • Create New...