Higgs

Well unfortunately I cannot help you with Polish translations. I merely realized they were outdate because a Polish member of the community struggled with it. I can help you with German if that would be an option? (Although as far as I am aware you do have team members who are fluent in German) If that would be beneficial to you, I can send you an e-mail. Perhaps however, some of the new AI translation tools could be of use? I don't know if that is an option for you as a development team but I have seen some excellent results by use of such tools.

I guess if someone finds anymore of these mistakes or misstranslations or whatever this thread can double as some sort of archive for those.

A member of the Polish community recently had troubles with the tutorials. After further inspection it appears there are some errors in them. Here some things I found quickly. This is an excerpt from the Leopard 2A4 gunnery tutorial. More specifically Leo 2A4 Gunnery F It tells the player to enter a manual range by pressing the range on the keyboard and then pressing enter. However the way to do it is to switch to the interior view and using the mouse to interact with the knob as you would in real life. I assume this is an older version from a time where the knob wasn't usable. Interestingly the English tutorial got it right. I assume it has been updated. However switching to the language Polish will result in the old English tutorial to appear. Which also tells the player to use the keyboard. The tutorial for the Leopard 2A5 is also correct in English. Althoug there are some other minor mistakes. (It's the E1000 button not E00 button. The GPS WILL NOT display FE00A. I think that is the case on the Leopard 1A5 but on the Leopard 2 it will read F100A.) To demonstrate I pressed the button here. And you can see the correct range appear here. This is the correct behaviour in my experience with these vehicles in real life. Now I know this is a long post with lots of pictures but I thought it might be helpful. I don't know how much time anyone is willing to put into these or if someone from the community can help but I it was suggested to make a post by a member of the community. So here we are. I am aware these are minor details that don't effect gameplay really so whether it worth the effort is up to someone else. I just wanted to let you know.

A11 confirmed.

Thank you, I am aware of that. I did not understand however that the AI would set the WBG into STANDBY. I assumed it just switched to the daysight.

Okay I found it. [Num +] is simply the switch between the WBG and the daysight. The Leopard 2 uses a mirror that can be "hinged" back and forth to use either the thermal sight or the daysight. ([Shift] + [Num +]) is the toggle bewteen thermal sight ON/OF/STANDBY. What the AI does is set the entire thing into STANDBY rather than simply switch to the daysight. From you previous comment I assumed that is what the AI does. (Which would makes sense on the Leopard 2 since newer models and the ones I am familiar with from the Swiss Armed Forces have a small slit that allows you to at least see something with closed shield doors.) So what you actually have to do is set the WBG back into ON rather than just switch to it. That's good to know and means there's no bug, which is good. Thank you for your help!

How do I get my TIS out of the standby then? Numpad + doesn’t work. what do I have to do?

I just made a quick test with this. I could open the ballistic shield doors manually and use the daysight. However switching to the thermal imaging sight would only leave me with a black screen. I tested it on the Leopard 2A4. It does appear to work on the M1A1 where upon opening the doors, the thermal imaging sight and the daysight are usable. I also attempted to turn off the TIS (by turning of the turret and entering "Emergency Mode". After the TIS has cooled down again I still only get a black screen. They daysight still works as expected. Edit. I tested it with the Leopard 2A6 which shows the same behaviour as the Leopard 2A4.

For a bare minimum I would suggest to tick the option that destroyed vehicles disappear after a short while. I know that‘s gamey and all but it might just save us some troubles.

A11 confirmed.

Australian time travel magic at work once again...

Unfortunately I won’t have time. I wish you loads of fun.

And just like that I forgot to link the post. https://www.steelbeasts.com/topic/17350-sbprope-gefgem-22dec23-blue-phoenix-91/#comment-237727

Well today evening is the SBProPE-GefGem event. Which is a recurring friday evening game hosted by some German players but open to all. I will be there and if you’re interested, you can habe a look and take control of a tank.

Can't make it this week either.

My main system is still not connected to the internet. I, unfortunately, doubt it will be back online by Friday. I wish you loads of fun though. The scenario looks very interesting.

I cannot tell you yet if my system will have acess to the internet on Sunday. If it does, I'm happy to participate but it will be a 50/50 until then. I can now say that I will not be able to participate. I wish everyone fun.

Would it be possible to make vehicle emplacements trigger based? That way one could create a scenario with a force that can be chosen by triggers (for example Trigger 1=M1A2 Abrams, Trigger 2=Leopard 2A6) and still have working vehicle emplacements. Some emplacements are compatible with the "wrong" vehicle, but especially tanks from eastern origin often don't work with emplacements of other vehicles.

Won't be around. See you next week hopefully. Have fun.

I'd love to participate because I really like this scenario. However changes are very low that it will work. So I wish everyone lots of fun.

Why? The T-72B3 is a lot of fun.

1-1B I suppose.