F.T

11 hours ago, Ssnake said:

What's shown in the log files of the Download Manager?

I tried it again today. It still failed.

Here is the contents of the log file.

[11:18:27,055] INFO : Version 55
[11:18:27,726] TRACE: Interprocess emulation folder: 'C:\ProgramData\eSim Games\Steel Beasts Map Transfer Tools\IPC'
[11:18:27,726] INFO : MQ name: SB_00013964
[11:19:25,417] INFO : Download failed!
 

10 hours ago, Ssnake said:

Did you try to download multiple maps simultaneously?

I didn't download multiple maps at once. In fact, I couldn't use the tool to download any maps. This is the problem I encountered after upgrading 4.357.

29 minutes ago, Ssnake said:

o     Kiev East                               3627b1a9-a197-49e8-a738-59a0b49076b5

o     Kiev West                              8fd98b23-f3b7-45b4-b704-326aabb3aedb

o     Kramatorsk                           cc091848-e1cc-4156-a4c4-4e47e3b2c1f7

o     “Oksbøl Training Area”        7e0e7e2e-27c9-4aad-9a85-8974d8496cd5

o     Mykolaiev-Cherson              3407856e-3460-426f-84ed-acc914240844

o     Severodonetsk                      952710e5-3a55-4ae7-9fbc-634f2e841bd1

Download failed

I hope to have more realistic thermal images in the future.

4.357

27 minutes ago, BlackDeath said:

Anyway, even World of tanks proposes an armor model of its own. Is it accurate? I'd say no, but still, it is good enough for what it does.

In terms of gameplay, World of Tanks does a good job.

6 hours ago, Ssnake said:

gunnery and crew procedure training; here, the accuracy of armor models is of lesser importance

Is there a game out there that has more accurate armor models than SB?

1 hour ago, Ssnake said:

Export-restriction for thermal imagers begin where the framerate exceeds 10fps

But the French supplied thermal cameras to the Russian tanks.

1 hour ago, Ssnake said:

Not in the sense that electromagnetic radiation has a specific range limit; you can see the Andromeda galaxy with the naked eye, and it's 2 million light years away. My FLIR camera can make out the moon, still 360,000 to 400,000km away.

Export-restriction for thermal imagers begin where the framerate exceeds 10fps (so most commercial thermal cameras are capped at 9, except the ones from China, it seems); the higher end TIs have higher sensor resolution (which extends the range at which you can identify a target) and are often liquid nitrogen-cooled for higher sensitivity.

Faster imaging speed，higher resolution , higher sensitivity.

Do military thermal imagers have the advantage of detection range?

Is T72b3 using a second-generation thermal imager?

The tank's 1500 hp diesel engine.

24 minutes ago, Ssnake said:

The resolution is identical, but the effective pixel density is higher on the monitor (because it's not filling the entire screen).

thanks

17 minutes ago, Grenny said:

Ok , so you are talking about the gunners sight, and the sight extension and the Leo2A5. But that is not "better" on the TCs sight extension....or how do you define "better"?

 

On the monitor, you can see more detail , and the image flickers less.

15 minutes ago, Kingtiger said:

If yes its because the thermal camera on the tank commanders view is newer then the gunners thermal by like 20-30 years or so,

Even with the same thermal camera, is the image better on the LCD monitor than in the GPS?

You can see it better on the monitor.

22 minutes ago, Ssnake said:

Given the chance we would, of course, do it. How likely that is to happen, I don't know.

At any rate, I remain hopeful.

As a result, more memory can support larger maps.

19 minutes ago, Ssnake said:

Not in this update; 4.3 continues to use the (heavily modified, lighting-improved, high-res terrain-enabled) Viper Engine that we adapted with version 3.0. So all this talk here is about version 5.0 and beyond. It's quite likely that there will be a Version 4.5 and/or 4.8 release before 5.0 is in a shape and form that it's suitable to replace the existing SB Pro PE.

Oh，5.0 will be in the distant future.

1 hour ago, Ssnake said:

Denmark's desire for a land war in East Asia are, as far as I'm informed, limited. A comparable aspiration level can be assumed for Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, the Netherlands, Spain - all of which constitute our main military customers. Australia seems to be happy with what fits their Opfor manual.

Also, if you remember the news, on February 24th 2022 the European perspective shifted towards Russia. So, I suspect that it will not shift as rapidly towards East Asia as you might hope for.

Aren't Britain, France and Germany main military customers?

24 minutes ago, IrishHussar said:

So just to clarify a few points for you.
SB Pro PE models the Challenger 2 tank, Operation Granby units used Challenger (1). The FCS are drastically different between the two vehicles.

I can't give much informed input about CR2 FCS as I only used it for a short time over 20 years ago however on Challenger 1 I know the facts inside out.

Challenger 1 when firing Hesh would give you a full balistic calculation out to 9999 metres. Further out you could use the Quadrant Fire Control (QFC) out to 14500ish.

  

So you were a tank crew. That's awesome!

27 minutes ago, BlackDeath said:

=>What new features will 4.3 have?

 

Subscribe to Esim YT channel to see latest vids regarding 4.3

https://www.youtube.com/c/eSimGamesDtl

Thanks.