RooksAndKings

On 9/14/2023 at 7:12 PM, ingrahammark7 said:

https://web.archive.org/web/20230715091936/https://forums.flightsimulator.com/t/fake-gripen-video/599765

 

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://forum.dcs.world/topic/307906-highway-to-physical-reality/page/3/&ved=2ahUKEwjK9IKrnKuBAxVAElkFHcSJCy0QFnoECA8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw2QEZsOJm9-bcHwTBu9VUm_

 

No aircraft has turned 7g for 2 seconds. I showed everything in the game is physically impossible, and planes don't turn forever at infinite g like they do in video games.

 

This is why the developers left upon realizing their entire flight model and understanding of reality was wrong and dcs has not released any updates for months.

 

For steel beasts I did a similar thing but the violations of reality in tank games are more acceptable.

 

 

Was this the same SB suggestion that tank engagements below 500 meters never happen? 

Just dropping this here; 

Hope everything is alright. See you next weekend. 

1 hour ago, CharlieB said:

The author seems to be linked to the USMC. Interested in how you’ve put you VBS suites together for open access. British army has VBS but not in a easy access form that you imply.

MCU uses a Wargaming Cloud built on Azure. I haven't seen any use of VBS at MCU yet but the Wargaming Cloud allows students to access a digital library of games from either an internet browser or remote desktop app. 

1 hour ago, Apocalypse 31 said:

I see that the author gave no credit to where those graphics came from. That's cool. 

 

I'm also not really sure what this article is about. Soldiers can reserve time at their home-station Simulations Center and jump into VBS much more easily than they can get multiple copies of Steel Beasts (not supported by US Army) and multiple gaming computers and all the hardware that it would take to run a training event. 

 

The US Army has built in simulations time as part of the gunnery training progression. It's in our doctrine to run simulations as part of the initial gunnery tables. 

 

Again...not sure what the author is talking about. 

Added links;

A22 please

11 hours ago, RedWardancer said:

You COULD hire us treadheads...😎

There's hope! 😁

C11 for myself and BillyWaugh. We would like to multicrew. 

If possible can someone take CO? I'm going to sit out the next couple of weeks but don't want to leave you hanging. 

@Figmo42 has volunteered

O66 

Husky Actual wants A34. Getting him on the forums and he didn't know there was an event today. Showing him the ropes. 

Overall Commander Please. 

Embrace The Attrition.

Team Name: The Doohan Detachment

Tank: M1A2

Camouflage Scheme: US

Tank Commander: TBD

Gunner: TBD

Driver: TBD

Reserve (optional):

I'm looking for poor souls but I am interested. 

@Volcano Can we do this? Lots of interest in discord wanting to do another one sometime soon

Not exactly a tank or modern warfare wargame, but I recently picked this up on Steam and have been enjoying it so far. 

It's a war of the roses 2 player wargame. The PC AI can be customized supposedly, though I haven't dabbled into it. 

Blocks!: Richard III on Steam (steampowered.com)

RICHARD III | Blocks (blocks-games.com)
 

Unfortunately, I crushed this mission (LOL) already and I have work this Sunday. Good luck guys!

1-1A

Rest in peace. 

41 minutes ago, Nike-Ajax said:

 

 

 

Also this means you will be joining us ?

Yes. A kind soul is gonna hook me up so I can attend. 

2 minutes ago, Nike-Ajax said:

 

Allright I will bite:

A small one matching the numbers we have, if possible within the time constraints. If not then dont worry about it, I always find a solution

I'll get started based on the current manning list. 

33 minutes ago, Nike-Ajax said:

Hello Gentlemen

 

So for a number of valid and completely acceptable reasons, then we are a bit light on manning for tomorrow. Its summer so nothing alarming or unexpected. We play in our spare time when we have time and feel like it.

 

Just as it should be.

 

That does mean though that the scenario I have posted is a bit too big for the manning.

But we always have a plan B.

 

In this case we will instead feature a Double-header. So two smaller scenarios instead of making convoluted attempts to execute one that is too big for our manning.

 

More to follow soon ...

If needed I can start on making a scenario just let me know. 

Disregard. 

2 hours ago, Apocalypse 31 said:

I'm in. @RooksAndKings

I'll scan for TOWs. Put me in A2 please

On 7/28/2022 at 6:57 PM, Combat Wasp said:

Can't make it.  Started a new job and have to do work things this Sunday.  Soon the dust will settle and I should be back.  Apologies.

Congrats on the new job

C22

Just now, Gibsonm said:

Was that made with this, or something else:

 

 

Both this and the last video were made with the Camera Animation Tool. I still think it has problems with how it works but at the end of the day it's a tank game.