Marko Posted May 24, 2016 Share Posted May 24, 2016 Looking at the complete list of playable vehicles. the VEC M1 a thermal equipped scout vehicle looks intersting 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaphod Posted May 24, 2016 Share Posted May 24, 2016 Bring out the T 34 , M4 Shermans and panzers IV and it could very well be Jurassic Beast 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vikingo Posted May 24, 2016 Share Posted May 24, 2016 (edited) June so close and so far away Edited May 24, 2016 by Vikingo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azure Lion Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 7 hours ago, Gibsonm said: And a very funny parody from Matsimus. Laf. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azure Lion Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Anyway, considering how much content and such coming out in 4.0, I can definitely see why you all have been busy for the past few years. Out of curiosity, how long have you all been working on all this for this new engine? Since 2.5 or earlier? I must admit that I am in awe and am very grateful for all your hard work, you have accomplished quite a feat! I also want to thank you for continuously updating Steel Beasts Pro PE while working on this major project. I'm almost curious as to how you will top this in 5.0 as I do not see a need to go to Steel Beasts III anytime within the near future. 4.0 might as well be the unofficial III with all these changes and updates. But I don't mind waiting, another surprise like this and my head might explode, and that's not a fun mess to clean up, especially if you don't have the mind to do it. Thanks again for your phenomenal efforts. Now, excuse me while I go into cryo-stasis for a month (as I don't know when in June), this wait is torturous. (Like a kid with a huge sweet tooth that just got his chore money and arrive at the candy store with a huge window on the storefront with all kinds of delicious candy on display, only to find out it just closed for the day.) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tread_Head57 Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 5 hours ago, Vikingo said: June so close and so far away Step into my shoes. I deploy next week for 9+ months and it's unlikely ill have personal internet where I'm going. No 4.0 and with a 2yr old and another on the way, no playing time when I get back. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpow66m Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Yeah,but you get to play with the real thing 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 1 hour ago, Tread_Head57 said: Step into my shoes. I deploy next week for 9+ months and it's unlikely ill have personal internet where I'm going. No 4.0 and with a 2yr old and another on the way, no playing time when I get back. Stay safe man! On the plus side: When you get back, maybe a patch is already applied to the bug/issues we had to live for the time :-) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ssnake Posted May 25, 2016 Members Share Posted May 25, 2016 2 hours ago, Azure Lion said: Out of curiosity, how long have you all been working on all this for this new engine? Since 2.5 or earlier? No. Al Delaney decided to retire in early 2012. We hired additional programmers more or less immediately and produced version 3.0 by end of the following year. The work on 4.0 more or less began on the release day of version 3.0, at least for some of the programmers (Miro in particular, since he's essentially in charge of the render engine and the terrain engine). The changes that you see in 4.0 (aside from the particle system and the cold war era vehicles) are the sum of all developments that we made for our army customers in the last two and a half years. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azure Lion Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 2 hours ago, Tread_Head57 said: Step into my shoes. I deploy next week for 9+ months and it's unlikely ill have personal internet where I'm going. No 4.0 and with a 2yr old and another on the way, no playing time when I get back. Stay safe out there, thank you for helping to keep the world safer than it would otherwise and congratulations~! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azure Lion Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 2 minutes ago, Ssnake said: No. Al Delaney decided to retire in early 2012. We hired additional programmers more or less immediately and produced version 3.0 by end of the following year. The work on 4.0 more or less began on the release day of version 3.0, at least for some of the programmers (Miro in particular, since he's essentially in charge of the render engine and the terrain engine). The changes that you see in 4.0 (aside from the particle system and the cold war era vehicles) are the sum of all developments that we made for our army customers in the last two and a half years. Wow, very nice for 2.5 years of work, most impressive. Huzzah for your army customers' requests~!... and financial backing. Bet they stole a peek at the wish list too. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RogueSnake79 Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 We had a fight last night, at a Chinese farm. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varyag Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 I'd really love to see the T-72B's different/upgraded fire control system in action! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 (edited) 15 minutes ago, varyag said: I'd really love to see the T-72B's different/upgraded fire control system in action! Isn't that here: On 22/05/2016 at 6:37 PM, dejawolf said: T-72M, M1, and B1 trying to fight off M60A3, and failing. Edited May 25, 2016 by Gibsonm 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashdivay Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Snake, and team, I must congratulate you guys for taking SB to the next level. I still have to see and consider the performance impact the upgrade will have on various hardware. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iarmor Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 3 hours ago, RogueSnake79 said: We had a fight last night, at a Chinese farm. Very nice screenshots, would love to see more, especially Israeli infantry. I just commented on this mission in the Video Thread: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TankHunter Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Death of a tank crew 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer_Leader Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 Did the interiors of the Challenger 2, Warrior or Scimitar receive any further 3D modelling in 4.0? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ssnake Posted May 25, 2016 Members Share Posted May 25, 2016 No. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgehog Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 10 hours ago, RogueSnake79 said: We had a fight last night, at a Chinese farm. YOU BASTARDS!! You utter, utter BASTARDS!!! Why couldn't you wait for me??!! Scenario, please? (When 4.0 is out) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpow66m Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 are there anymore suprises left or have we seen it all? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 48 minutes ago, Hedgehog said: YOU BASTARDS!! You utter, utter BASTARDS!!! Why couldn't you wait for me??!! Because: 1. There are trees. 2. The IDF has artillery. QED. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJ_Fubar Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 9 hours ago, Gibsonm said: Isn't that here: Not completely. All of the targets are stationary with no chance to see the left UVBU unit eyepiece provide mil correction data for moving targets. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vikingo Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 wow! That was ricochet? Or in/kill/out? Really like the ammo modeling in 4.0 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer_Leader Posted May 25, 2016 Share Posted May 25, 2016 2 hours ago, Ssnake said: No. OK, thanks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.