Jump to content
Kev2go

If you thought Black tail defense was bad ( "entertaining" presentations)

Recommended Posts

On 28/01/2018 at 11:23 AM, Grenny said:

While cost effectiveness has some mertits...the arguments of this guy are absolutely bonkers.

yup  not to mentions some of his arguments which he tries to pass off as facts , are factually incorrect. SOmeof what he uses to pass of as "facts" are selective proof, Arbitrary weighing, and at time pure conjecture.

 

 

 

I agree it has  cost savig merits to an extent. but Cost alone doesn't hold merit against many of his arguments, especially if the cost effective vehicle in question is hands down inferior to whats replacing it , Or even the tanks it would see in combat at that point in time ( T64,T72, T80B series). 

 

its hard to assume whats going in his mind but its almost as if its war gamer logic:

 

M48A5/ M60A1's cost 2 resource point and have a strength of 5. M1 cost 5 resource points and have a strength of 8. If I spend 10 points on M48s or M60 I have a unit with a strength of 25. If I spend 10 points on M1 I have a unit with a strength of 16. Therefore, M48A5 & M60A1 are better! xD

 

 

 

 

 

 

file.php?id=22695

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Kev2go

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...