Jump to content

Can we continue?  

14 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Did you understand the campaign would invole missions/AFV's from 1980's

    • Yes
      14
    • No
      0
    • Did not understand/ read First Clash
      0
  2. 2. Do you think First Clash can continue with out the Mech Inf combat team and follow the historical theme?

    • Yes
      9
    • No
      4
    • Tanks only would not be something I would take part in.
      1
  3. 3. Would you be intrested in playing without following the Historical content?

    • Yes
      5
    • No
      8
    • Yes, with modern AFV's (2000's)
      1

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 03/24/2018 at 12:05 AM

Recommended Posts

I, we have come to a decision point that was not foreseen at Campaign start.

 

This is your Campaign, therefor I need guidance if you would kindly voice your views please.

Edited by 12Alfa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be interested in a redux with a theme that follows the book yet with better "play balance". For example the OPFOR a T72M and upgrade the AS1 ammo a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I'd like to play "as per the book" as it provides a good challenge.

 

I think many / most of the issues could be resolved through adequate briefing, but I understand some people prefer to use the newest gear, as opposed to earlier variants. 

 

Unfortunately I could not make the offered dates / timing, hence my lack of participation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Gibsonm said:

 but I understand some people prefer to use the newest gear

 

I for one never step into 2A5, CV anything or a M1A2. It's cheating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some missions are not meant to be won, and you measure a "win" by how little units you lost or how little ground you gave up.  I can understand why that is a difficult thing to handle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Gibsonm said:

Personally I'd like to play "as per the book" as it provides a good challenge.

 

I think many / most of the issues could be resolved through adequate briefing,

I fully agree with Gibson statement. I also like the concept of playing the book storyline.

Using older gear also provides a very good challenge.

A very good briefing and a clear understanding of the limitations of the vehicles would help.

Also it would be good that a very fine tunned balance between BLUEFOR and OPFOR equipment is calculated.

In my oppinion having T-72 B2 (1985) was a litte bit futuristic for a 1984 and considering the Leo1AS limitations a very tough enemy for an scenario with only Leos and no TOW.

Said this I am all for the campaing and I would love to continue it as it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...