Rotareneg Posted July 29, 2019 Share Posted July 29, 2019 This is just an observation, not a critique, or complaint: SB 4.157 does not work at all on my older ( i5-3230M, 8 gigs of ram, integrated Intel HD 4000 graphics, definitely not a gaming system) laptop. It ran 4.0 just fine however, so I guess the minimum GPU requirement has gone up quite a bit. The symptoms are the game closing unexpectedly while trying to load a scenario, and freezing when trying to load the mission or map editor. Attached is a debug log from trying to load a tank range scenario. I suspect the following error is the relevant one, as a log taken when the mission editor freezes endlessly repeats this same error until you kill SB with the task manager. [16:52:01,213] CGame ERROR: Failed CGame::UpdateAndRender, Render3DEnvironment, hr=0x8876086C DebugLog.txt 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Sean Posted July 29, 2019 Administrators Share Posted July 29, 2019 Pro PE now uses video ram to a far greater extent than it used to. Intel integrated graphics has no RAM of its own, it uses a chunk of your system RAM. You may try allocating a bigger chunk of your system RAM to the integrated graphics card in the BIOS. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ssnake Posted July 29, 2019 Members Share Posted July 29, 2019 I could get the benchmark scenario to run on the HD4000 chip in one of my notebooks with a late beta version (probably 4.148), but even then I couldn't complete it. After maybe 40 minutes serious render artifacts appeared and eventually I aborted the whole experiment. So, there's nothing that changed which would inherently prevent Intel chips from running Steel Beasts, but the fact that the updated engine utilizes GPU functions a lot more means that the Intel integrated graphics are simply overtaxed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotareneg Posted July 30, 2019 Author Share Posted July 30, 2019 On that laptop the dedicated memory setting in the bios is apparently locked at 64 megs so that's a no-go, but seeing Ssnake's results along with how hard my desktop's GTX 760 is having to work to run it makes it pretty clear that a low-end integrated GPU is not going to cut it. As I said, it's not a gaming laptop so I'm not surprised or concerned. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.