Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

TNO test of the 35mm round of the CV90

Recommended Posts

Strange results related to 30 mm APFSDS rounds effectivenesses against "uparmored" BMP-3. This IFV is better armored than its predecessors but understand Soviet IFVs have very weak armor due to some doctrinal consideration, now effectively dead by the way.

So BMP-3 weighting 18,7 metric tons, and even up-armored, cannot withstand hits by current 30 mm APFSDS rounds. Such capabilities only have much heavier Western IFVs weighting 30-35 metric tons. US Army still relies on 25 mm Bushmaster I autocannon despite many modernization plans and not without reason. They know very well M919 APFSDS round is enough for foreseeable future against Eastern-style threats. Also Germans do not see reason to use extra-large guns and their super-heavy Puma IFV will get 30 mm autocannon instead. Besides the West developed many higher caliber autocannons in the past 20 years but not many of them actually materialized (Super-40, CTAS, Supershot-50, Rh-503 etc.). So capabilities exist but as for now they are not needed...

PS. BMP-3 is now rather sentenced to death because even Russians claimed it is outdated concept. That is also why Greece did not buy BMP-3.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Create New...