Eisenschwein Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 I would say it´s the "Kuwait" Camo... ?! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisenschwein Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Tjay, 1st gear ratio is lower than reverse.You can go faster in reverse than 1st. Exception being the T-72. Watch a "J turn" video. Typically when the car heads off forwards again you'll use either 2nd or 3rd. Ah, I see. That´s the reason everyone in Britain drive backwards..?! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tirta Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 I would say it´s the "Kuwait" Camo... ?!Are you sure?Does Kuwait have leopard tanks? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pulstar Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 I'm sure this has been asked for countless times already, but I'm already wishing for modelled crew members, especially witnessing how immersive it can be in SABOW. Whenever the hatches are unbuttoned and nothing pops up I get ghostly vibes haha. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stratos Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 I'm sure this has been asked for countless times already, but I'm already wishing for modelled crew members, especially witnessing how immersive it can be in SABOW. Whenever the hatches are unbuttoned and nothing pops up I get ghostly vibes haha.Agree 100% The long pendent subject for SB. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asid Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Would be great if the Infantry could climb a wall.... Seems to be a glaring omission. Maybe it has been mentioned before? And yes i know this is a Tank sim 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marko Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Would be great if the Infantry could climb a wall....Seems to be a glaring omission. Maybe it has been mentioned before? And yes i know this is a Tank sim +1 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tjay Posted August 15, 2014 Share Posted August 15, 2014 Would be great if the Infantry could climb a wall....Seems to be a glaring omission. Maybe it has been mentioned before? And yes i know this is a Tank sim +2 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
27Saxophone Posted August 16, 2014 Share Posted August 16, 2014 Please Sir, may I put in another request for anti-tank ditches so I can use SRAAW against the exposed bellies? Maybe (if the coding is similar to a vehicle emplacement) I can do it with them, but sideways? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted August 16, 2014 Share Posted August 16, 2014 Please Sir, may I put in another request for anti-tank ditches so I can use SRAAW against the exposed bellies? Maybe (if the coding is similar to a vehicle emplacement) I can do it with them, but sideways?Well of course there is nothing stopping you from trying it to see if it gives you the outcome you are after.Re-purposed tank scrapes maybe just what you are after. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
27Saxophone Posted August 17, 2014 Share Posted August 17, 2014 I did try to use tank scrapes set sideways, but the tanks could climb through relatively easily, and the lack of a bund on the friendly side greatly reduced their exposure. The sides are sloped for stability, not as an obstacle.I'm hoping that the coding for a tank ditch would be similar to that for a scrape, with steeper sides and a pile of "excavated earth" on one side.Cheers, 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stratos Posted August 18, 2014 Share Posted August 18, 2014 This thing as crewable: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RENEGADE-623 Posted August 18, 2014 Share Posted August 18, 2014 ok, thought of another one, but might be far-fetched:The ability in planning phase to select ammo load-out on a Bradley fighting vehicle. IE, load HE ready box with AP and AP ready box with HE. My platoon in both my deployments, some vehicles loaded AP heavy, (AP loaded on HE box) and some vehicles loaded HE heavy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 In reference to a mission 2 weeks ago (see in progress AAR at SimHQ: http://simhq.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/3998949/United_operations_%22Hasty_#Post3998949) I'd love to see sabot-pedals modeled in SB. I'm somewhat puzzled that army customers are not pressing for that one too...seems they don't love their grunts 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ssnake Posted August 22, 2014 Members Share Posted August 22, 2014 The requirement is there, but not with the highest priority. It's also a bit of a can of worms as computer-controlled crews would probably have to be made aware of all the secondary effects of gun fire - notably the cannon blast danger zone, sabot petal danger zone, ... and all that in a somewhat reliable fashion. That's quite a bit of work for one effect. Admittedly an important aspect, but maybe they have other means to educate crews about it and to train this (I doubt it, though). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 If you are modelling those effects, you'd also probably need to include:- The concussive and hearing effects of being in front of the muzzle when the gun is fired, and- The burns danger from being in the turret's frontal arc when you pop smoke (don't think that's currently modeled) and- The negative effects of being in front of the gun if Canister is fired (also can't remember if that's currently modeled or if it just affects enemy Infantry). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted August 22, 2014 Share Posted August 22, 2014 It also would need a 2 way aproach. The crews should avoid setting up bp or firing if they endanger infantry. The ai infantey must learn to avoid the danger zone 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Killjoy Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 A 432, crewable Centurion, crewable T-55 or Mk10 Cheiftain would be nice! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koen Posted August 24, 2014 Share Posted August 24, 2014 In the wishful thinking category: Kanonenjagdpanzer,kind of predecessor of Jaguar,crewable of course ;-)http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kanonenjagdpanzerhttp://www.battletanks.com/jagdpanzer_kanone.htm 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted August 26, 2014 Share Posted August 26, 2014 Has this been mentioned yet? (source: http://www.deutschesheer.de ) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted August 26, 2014 Share Posted August 26, 2014 Yep, a couple of times in fact. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
27Saxophone Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 Nothing so exciting as a weapon system: but can we amend the coding for a Boundary so it can have multiple line segments? It seems we can only draw a complex boundary as a series of separate lines, and it makes the task unduly time-consuming. Alternatively, can we add text to an existing Line to clearly denote it as a Boundary?Cheers, 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted August 31, 2014 Share Posted August 31, 2014 (edited) Not quite what you are after but what I do is draw the "custom line" for most of it and then insert the "Boundary" where the straight part is. You normally only have one or maybe two Boundary markers on a given edge of an AO, TAOR, etc. anyway. For example: and lower down ... Edited September 2, 2014 by Gibsonm 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ssnake Posted September 1, 2014 Members Share Posted September 1, 2014 Also, you can create a polyline with a text label like "||" or "XXX" at the end of it, followed by another polyline. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingtiger Posted September 1, 2014 Share Posted September 1, 2014 (edited) What I want :luxhello: Bv410 Troop version Logistics version AMB version Command version With: either RWS (Norweign Kongsberg) or open ringmount, with 7.62, 12.7 and 40mm GL as option with a M249 or M240 in the back hatch. :gun: Edited September 1, 2014 by Kingtiger 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.