ChrisWerb Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 The ability to make speculative platforms by modifying existing ones - put a 57mm gun on CV90 for example - and experiment with terminal ballistics, fragmentation radii etc. I know that's a big ask. Sorry! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavictoireestlavie Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 18 hours ago, ChrisWerb said: Vehicles to show damage in places where they are hit as in a popular alleged tank simulator/MMORG/FPS... +1 I would love to see damage on tanks. Would be neat if users were allowed to turn that feature on an off and if possible, adjustable as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delta6 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 I know I will never see it but the Mekerva MK 4...Beautiful vehicle.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ssidiver Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 13 minutes ago, delta6 said: I know I will never see it but the Mekerva MK 4...Beautiful vehicle.... I hate to think it will never be 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delta6 Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 I think Israel is pretty tight lipped when it comes to their MBT's...Especially that one.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavictoireestlavie Posted June 18, 2017 Share Posted June 18, 2017 5 hours ago, delta6 said: I know I will never see it but the Mekerva MK 4...Beautiful vehicle.... Never say never. The Merkava Mk3(Baz and Dor Dalet) and Mk4 could be implemented as non-crewable AI tanks like the current Merkava 2B. I do not want to be "promiscuous" towards "my baby" but they are beauties: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
delta6 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Now you have me drooling!!! You do know that a Logitech solar keyboard costs $40.00+ don't you??? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisWerb Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 I know this is an old chestnut, but I'd love to see the helicopter damage model revamped as helos can now take an amazing amount of hits from the frontal arc and stay airborne and fighting. This is what it took to take down two Mi 24s in a recent scenario - they were a few hundred metres from the Finnish defenders and one ended up hovering over them at treetop height. One took 11 x M430 HEDP hits (all frontal and all outside minimum safe arming distance so functioned as normal), an NLAW/Storm (again outside minimum safe arming distance) and infantry 7.62 SA fire (the latter from directly underneath which eventually took it out). I have had hinds survive three RBS-70 frontal hits undamaged. Helos seem realistically vulnerable from angles other than frontal, so I assume this is either a glitch or done intentionally to make them more survivable for training value. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisWerb Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Small and nano copter UAVs and ones that drop 40mm grenades fitted with shuttlecock tails. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpow66m Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Troops that shoot on the move.nothing like seeing a Batt. of T72s and Bmps emerge out of the smoke w troops a blazing from the hip. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisWerb Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Infantry that can become invisible to simulate taking cover. At the moment infantry - even very well equipped ones - are inevitably killed by vehicle MG fire if they stay put, once they have expended their AT weapons. Yes, it would make sense to retreat and take up another BP elsewhere, but that's not always possible. Just looking at the relatively open terrain around my home in Orkney, there are plenty of places where infantry could take cover out of LoS. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpow66m Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 sounds good too.i hope there is a major Inf. overhaul coming soon.id also like to see the AI more aggressive and use suppressive fire more 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisWerb Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Forest trees that are not made of depleted uranium and kill three drew members in a 10 mph collision. it is never desirable to hit a tree, but, in reality, many plantations are made up of less substantial trees. Northern forest is often silver birch which live only 40-50 years and seldom grow particularly thick or have deep, substantial root systems. Conifer plantations are often harvested long before they reach the size that would cause a tank to come to an immediate full stop from speed - in reality you would run into many immature plantations too. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 17 hours ago, mpow66m said: sounds good too.i hope there is a major Inf. overhaul coming soon.id also like to see the AI more aggressive and use suppressive fire more Well arguably the last two or three updates have all been "major Inf overhauls". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaphod Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 5 hours ago, ChrisWerb said: Forest trees that are not made of depleted uranium and kill three drew members in a 10 mph collision. it is never desirable to hit a tree, but, in reality, many plantations are made up of less substantial trees. Northern forest is often silver birch which live only 40-50 years and seldom grow particularly thick or have deep, substantial root systems. Conifer plantations are often harvested long before they reach the size that would cause a tank to come to an immediate full stop from speed - in reality you would run into many immature plantations too. Yeah , try backing up from a still position and hit a tree in much less of 10 meters and knocking out the driver..... it is unreal 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 16 minutes ago, Zaphod said: Yeah , try backing up from a still position and hit a tree in much less of 10 meters and knocking out the driver..... it is unreal You could always try looking where you are going (like the crew commander is supposed to) and just avoid the tree. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nike-Ajax Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 34 minutes ago, Gibsonm said: You could always try looking where you are going (like the crew commander is supposed to) and just avoid the tree. I am with Gibson at least as far as the looking part. A midsize conifer can do bad things to the anus of your tank. And to your tracks if you Are unlucky. having said that, then the attack of the deadly trees is obviously a bug. A bug that Esim and the Ssnake is aware of. Hopefully they are working on it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 I guess I'm just saying be careful what you wish for. If excessive damage (in some people's opinions) is a bug, then surely not replicating a "barrel strike" is a bug too. If you want the damage thing fixed to make it more "realistic" then we should have the barrel strike implemented (no more barrels just slicing through tree trunks) to fix that unrealistic part as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marko Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Never say never. The Merkava Mk3(Baz and Dor Dalet) and Mk4 could be implemented as non-crewable AI tanks like the current Merkava 2B. I do not want to be "promiscuous" towards "my baby" but they are beauties: Quote Hell has just frozen over. LoL lavictoireestlavie has just cheated on the Leclerc. LoL 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nike-Ajax Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 regarding barrel strike, then the Leo 2 have a safeguard for just that eventuality: a pressure of more than 40 kg to the side of the cannon will disengage the turret lock... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rad Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Iran 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 11 minutes ago, Rad said: Iran So you want the SB infantry armed with flowers? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSe419E Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Maybe he wants photorealistic cardboard targets to practice against. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nike-Ajax Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 37 minutes ago, TSe419E said: Maybe he wants photorealistic cardboard targets to practice against. I used to use that picture in my shooting club. Until someone for reasons unknown thought it was in bad taste. So I switched to Stalin, which apparently also had a fanclub. Then I used Kim Jong Il, and then gave up the whining... And told me to remember to take the targets with me after I punched holes in em ... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 40 minutes ago, Nike-Ajax said: I used to use that picture in my shooting club. Until someone for reasons unknown thought it was in bad taste. So I switched to Stalin, which apparently also had a fanclub. Then I used Kim Jong Il, and then gave up the whining... And told me to remember to take the targets with me after I punched holes in em ... as if you'd anywhere near the target ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.