Jump to content
Panzer_Leader

US Army Doctrine 2015

Recommended Posts

For those interested in the latest doctrinal concepts of the US Army, refined after 10-plus years of continuous war fighting, they are available to download from a single page at: http://usacac.army.mil/cac2/MCCOE/Doctrine2015Tables.asp

There’s some excellent and accessible (most papers are less than 20 pages long) stuff here.

Geat! Thank you for sharing this with us!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Is this not secret?

Nope:

DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION:

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

(from a cover of one of the documents).

And thanks, Panzer Leader, good find.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nope:

DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION:

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

(from a cover of one of the documents).

And thanks, Panzer Leader, good find.

In addition to rump's comments, it was promoted on Twitter by the United States Army Combined Arms Center (@usacac), which is how I discovered it, and it sits on a public URL so, no, it's definitely not secret.

Enjoy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to mention it also goes along with the current administration's propensity to leak classified military information. See the Navy SEALS for details.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not to mention it also goes along with the current administration's propensity to leak classified military information. See the Navy SEALS for details.

I was just listening to a radio show discussing this very topic. The guest was confident that the recent "leaks" are intentional, at least in part. Their justification was that the material being released is available only to a select few.

Of course, the guest also mentioned the possibility of an insider going to the local bar and blabbing a few secrets to his journalist friend just to get his jollies seeing it in the paper the next morning. ...Who knows?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well after a brief reading through the whole lot, if this is the best TRADOC can come up with after ten years, the US Army is...not being well served.

I love how thier stated goal of "transforming the Army's doctrinal base to deliver doctrine - clear, concise, current and accessible - to the point of need" is immediately subverted in the opening pages of ADP 3-0 with "logic charts" graced with such worthy statements as "Cognitively link tactical actions to strategic objectives"; zounds!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmmmmmmm...... I think that the ambiguity is intentional. Why else would it be distribution statement A?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's not one Defence Contractor commenting on another writing team / Contractor's work is it? :)

Maybe :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well after a brief reading through the whole lot, if this is the best TRADOC can come up with after ten years, the US Army is...not being well served.

I love how thier stated goal of "transforming the Army's doctrinal base to deliver doctrine - clear, concise, current and accessible - to the point of need" is immediately subverted in the opening pages of ADP 3-0 with "logic charts" graced with such worthy statements as "Cognitively link tactical actions to strategic objectives"; zounds!

Already think that if I read this my head will explode. I'll stick to the FM 100-5 that I still have when I left uniformed service 20+ years ago (it was published in '86 when the US actually had a REAL Commander in Chief).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Already think that if I read this my head will explode. I'll stick to the FM 100-5 that I still have when I left uniformed service 20+ years ago (it was published in '86 when the US actually had a REAL Commander in Chief).

A REAL Commander-in-Chief? You mean the one we currently have is FAKE? Goodness, you had better alert the authorities then :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Already think that if I read this my head will explode. I'll stick to the FM 100-5 that I still have when I left uniformed service 20+ years ago (it was published in '86 when the US actually had a REAL Commander in Chief).

Please let's not get into religion and politics stuff in the open forum.

See: Forum Rules

General Forum rules

No foul language...

No political/Religion/Sex discussion

No Porn links . . . .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Damn :-(

;-)

Let's be honest - you don't need this site to find your daily dose of online porn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...