Panzer_Leader Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 (edited) Great, so now the Danes have the meanest looking playable MBT (Leopard 2A5A2 DK), the meanest looking playable APC (M113G4) and one of the meanest playable IFVs (CV9035 DK). I thought with the crewable M1A2 SEP I wouldn't want to get into a Leopard 2A5+ variant again but it seems I won't be able to stop myself now... :decu: EDIT: I also love the way the Barracuda camouflage on the 2A5A2 suppresses its thermal signature in image #27 Edited June 28, 2013 by Panzer_Leader 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Volcano Posted June 28, 2013 Moderators Share Posted June 28, 2013 But at the end of fixing the puzzle, eSim must settle on something - be that a compromise or assumption - to work out an protection estimate. That "something" right before estimation, rather than a holy grail primary source or final LOS protection picture, was what I was asking. No, at the end of the day we don't have to settle on something. We can, and almost always do, use bits of data from one book, and photographs and measurements from someone in the field, and vehicle manuals for other parts. We use everything we can, and do not limit ourselves to one source. Also, when one vehicle is finished we move on to the next, in a never ending cycle of data gathering and work. We don't have scribes that chronicles what source was used for what parts of the tank, so that is why I cannot tell you. The short answer is: we use all sorts of sources (just like everything else in SB, so I wouldn't know by now what came from where). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Invader ZIM Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Great, so now the Danes have the meanest looking playable MBT (Leopard 2A5A2 DK), the meanest looking playable APC (M113G4) and one of the meanest playable IFVs (CV9035 DK). I thought with the crewable M1A2 SEP I wouldn't want to get into a Leopard 2A5+ variant again but it seems I won't be able to stop myself now... Uhhh... What he said!! :shocked: That's one mean looking tank, and this version 3.0 is already sensory overload. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Companion Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 No, at the end of the day we don't have to settle on something. We can, and almost always do, use bits of data from one book, and photographs and measurements from someone in the field, and vehicle manuals for other parts. We use everything we can, and do not limit ourselves to one source.Also, when one vehicle is finished we move on to the next, in a never ending cycle of data gathering and work. We don't have scribes that chronicles what source was used for what parts of the tank, so that is why I cannot tell you. The short answer is: we use all sorts of sources (just like everything else in SB, so I wouldn't know by now what came from where). I...don't think you've understood me but it seems getting what I requested would take considerable time at backtracking the work anyway. Again thanks for delivering the T-64 :wink: Now, quickly, give us BV! :sonic: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pii Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 It may be surprising to some of you but commies actually have proper brains and don't "zerg"What!? This can't be true! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Now, quickly, give us BV! :sonic: Well I'm sure the Brewing Vessel is indeed modelled in the Challenger, Warrior and Scimitar. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Companion Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Well I'm sure the Brewing Vessel is indeed modelled in the Challenger, Warrior and Scimitar. Ouch. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tjay Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Well I'm sure the Brewing Vessel is indeed modelled in the Challenger, Warrior and Scimitar. Well, UK Armour isn't going anywhere without it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusty Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Well, UK Armour isn't going anywhere without it. Perish the thought dear boy, and let's not forget the hobnobs :biggrin: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickMow Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Perish the thought dear boy, and let's not forget the hobnobs :biggrin:Errr Biscuits Fruit AB.....thank you ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedgehog Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Perish the thought dear boy, and let's not forget the hobnobs :biggrin: And tea and milk and sugar. Chocolate Hobnobs? :biggrin: Well, it's counter to the very idea, since Chewbacca doesn't actually draw bolts, it shoots energy. He's got like a bandolier for what I assume are energy packs or something. So the system is purely cosmetic.Seems like the Force wouldn't approve of vanity. Well according to the "Information" on the Wookie Bowcaster in Jedi Knight 2 (FPS shooter type game), it fires actual "steel" bolts that are encased in energy. An armored recovery vehicle with extra long towing cable would be a more appropriate vehicle if you are at all faithful to Star Wars. :thumbup: sentry gun looks cool what are "NATO target" and "Custom" in this screenshot? :sonic: Dummy tanks? An overlooked entry from a menu of a Steel Beasts version that you will never get (internal development thing - and NO, this does NOT mean that this feature will ever make it into the Personal Edition ... some things are better left untouched). Like I said: They are Pro and Developer version items. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Killjoy Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 PzKw V Panther Ausf.G Man after my own heart. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Invader ZIM Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 I have a question about the Leopard 2A5A2 DK's lower thermal signature.Will it be possible to make it so the opposing AI units have a lower chance to detect the unit, especially at longer ranges, considering how some parts of it blend very well with the background thermal radiation of the terrain, etc.? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ssnake Posted June 28, 2013 Members Share Posted June 28, 2013 I suppose so, but right now this is an effect that will affect only human players. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Invader ZIM Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Not a problem, thanks for the quick response Ssnake. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalAB Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 Gents here realize that the new 2A5A2 is now the shit right? Lower thermals, increased resistance to RPG, that coax looks like a chopper. Simply insane eSim. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpabrams Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 Gents here realize that the new 2A5A2 is now the shit right? Lower thermals, increased resistance to RPG, that coax looks like a chopper. Simply insane eSim.Yeah and that camo skirt! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkAngel Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 Bah... Tank in drag!!. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalAB Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 LMFAO, and as soon as that Queen hits the streets I'm the first dog bringing it home to Mom and Dad. Thank God I'm fracked up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TankGirl90 Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 That 2A5A2 could make a great new Jennifer, generally a 2A6 but this 2A5 could work just as if not better 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpabrams Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 How about some more screen shots? It's been a whole week and I am bored with video card this and memory that. We want pictures, eyes candy, tank porn! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skybird03 Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 ^Yes. Burning tanks, muzzle flashes from tank cannons, smoking tank wrecks, buildings on fire, these are the effects that now are wanted to be illustrated! I expect massive improvements on these details! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marko Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 How about some more screen shots? It's been a whole week and I am bored with video card this and memory that. We want pictures, eyes candy, tank porn!+1More candy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TankGirl90 Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 How about some more screen shots? It's been a whole week and I am bored with video card this and memory that. We want pictures, eyes candy, tank porn! +1 Hehe tank porn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TankHunter Posted July 5, 2013 Share Posted July 5, 2013 Ya, more tank porn. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.