Tacom Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 Someime ago I added a request in TheList! for radios in the vehicles.I defended how easy it would be to arrange the radio networks for the multiplayer engagements if the S-2 defines frecuencies and you just join in.Now there is an small plug in for TS, designed for DCShttp://ariescon.com/index1.htmlthat allows to do just that. This link only works with DCS but there is an standalone version incluided in what they call the ground radio.http://ariescon.com/index5.html 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisenschwein Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 Eh, you can do that with TS 3 already... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacom Posted June 22, 2013 Author Share Posted June 22, 2013 Its main drawback is that it is payware. After one hour it stops working and you have to close and open it again.Now there is an annoying bug that prevents it from closing, so you have to kill the process, but the developer told me that it will be solved next weekThere is one VHF-AM radio, one VHF-FM and one UHF with frecuencies117.975-159.975, 0.025225.000-399.000, 0.02530.000-76.000, 0.025One of the best features that it has it that you can adjust the volumes individually, a bless at busy times when you are trying to hear your callsigns while somebody is talking with support in the command channel.By the way, you can hide the box so once you have configured your radios you dont need to see it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacom Posted June 22, 2013 Author Share Posted June 22, 2013 Vehicles in general could use the simple version with box 1 and 2 for comunications and box 3 used incaso you need comunications inside the vehicle. Command vehicles could use the so called ground radio, with allows for more radios and even a simulation of phonelines. The handicap is that it only have 2 radios that you can sintonize on the fly, while the rest of the radios need to run a configuration program to set them up. But easily enough, we could configure it with the main networks BG, CSS, artillery and use the configurable radios for sporadic comunications. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacom Posted June 22, 2013 Author Share Posted June 22, 2013 Eh, you can do that with TS 3 already...How? I´ve been looking for it for ages. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 I think he means whisper lists. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoggydog Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 TS3 is a fantastic piece of software but I think it has its limitations in representing military networks even with whisper lists. This is most notable in large missions like LNOT with many users.Yes TS works but we shouldn't be closed off from looking at future alternatives 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacbat Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 I wish you luck trying to get the online community to use something other than TS. Some people can't even figure that out. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkAngel Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 B.O.C 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tjay Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 B.O.C Meaning? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJ_Fubar Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 Blue Oyster Cult? Got every studio album, great group...don't see the relevance... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacbat Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 It's an inside joke. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eisenschwein Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 How? I´ve been looking for it for ages.Plt Member: Talk to Plt Leader/Listen/Whisper to CO (or Whisper to Crew if needed) Plt Leader: Talk to Plt Member/Whisper to COCO: Talk to Plt Leaders/Whisper to Higher CommandCFS, Maintenance,Medics,Eng a.s.o.: Talk to CO were attached/ Whisper to Higher CommandSo, were is the Problem ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacom Posted June 23, 2013 Author Share Posted June 23, 2013 I wish you luck trying to get the online community to use something other than TS. Some people can't even figure that out. Yea, I see the problem. Even more when this IS Teamspeak. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacbat Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 LOL, I should have said "basic TS". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacom Posted June 23, 2013 Author Share Posted June 23, 2013 Plt Member: Talk to Plt Leader/Listen/Whisper to CO (or Whisper to Crew if needed) Plt Leader: Talk to Plt Member/Whisper to COCO: Talk to Plt Leaders/Whisper to Higher CommandCFS, Maintenance,Medics,Eng a.s.o.: Talk to CO were attached/ Whisper to Higher CommandSo, were is the Problem ?That it is easier.BG: 125.00Company A: 350.00I just sintonize those two frecuencies and I'm in the net. No more asking, who do I add to the whisper list?Anybody can be listening in any network easily.I can work the volumes as I need. No more "standby, somebody talking on the other net and I can't hear you.If I want one of my calsigns to join another unit, they just sintonize their frecuencie and are done. No need for ALT-Tab-move-yourself-to-another-channel.And so on.In a nutshell: it's easier and opens more possibilities. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacom Posted June 23, 2013 Author Share Posted June 23, 2013 LOL, I should have said "basic TS". Yea. Precission. It is something that is already done in the Falcon, DCS and ARMA communities. But of course, there is already implanted so you use it or don't fly multiplayer. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacbat Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 Yeah, I used TARS when I was into the DCS Shark and Hog. It certainly enhanced the experience. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 T.b.h.: is don't see any feature so far that can't be done with (basic)TS allready.So whats the gain? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacom Posted June 23, 2013 Author Share Posted June 23, 2013 Just one, Ok.Independent volumes for every whisper list, that I can modify on the fly, without leaving the simulator. Sorry, thats three.And yes, most of it can be done now. But it's PITA. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingtiger Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 I am open to try it out, Would be à Pity to miss something good just because we refusera to try it. /KT 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ratel Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 We use something called A.C.R.E in ArmA2/3. Makes a huge difference and avoids the PIA of having to setup whispers etc in TS when you have a 100+ people in sections/platoons etc. It adds to immersion and the RTO role is a skill and an art form all of its own.fQIOQ-zRuM8 This obviously won't work in SB, but my point is that the pro's far out way the cons and counter arguments given here. I have not used TARS but IIRC it also models;- Realistic terrain affects for radios. Signal lose & distortion from buildings, hills, trees, and other objects. Realistic power output and antenna length considerations for all radios that effect signal. Realistic frequency wavelength falloff; higher frequencies do not travel as far. Real-time positional calculation for fast-moving objects 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 This obviously won't work in SB, but my point is that the pro's far out way the cons and counter arguments given here.Well if the “con” is that it doesn’t work in SB Pro PE / TS then I suspect the “pros” are irrelevant? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ratel Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Well if the “con” is that it doesn’t work in SB Pro PE / TS then I suspect the “pros” are irrelevant?Im using ACRE as an example (of what can be done) and saying that the benefits of a similar system such as TARS is worth the squeeze :-) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted June 27, 2013 Share Posted June 27, 2013 Calytrix CNR, http://www.calytrix.com/products/cnr/sim/Used with VBS2 and SB PRO. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.