Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Our plan is to develop 3.0 "as it is" to the point that it "could" be released. Then we will work on the particle effects, and see how quickly we can make progress. The benefit of this solution is that there's a somewhat safe fallback option, but I must confess that I would hate to release version 3.0 with the old smoke, fire, and dust effects.

It's supposed to be shiny and new.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Our plan is to develop 3.0 "as it is" to the point that it "could" be released. Then we will work on the particle effects, and see how quickly we can make progress. The benefit of this solution is that there's a somewhat safe fallback option, but I must confess that I would hate to release version 3.0 with the old smoke, fire, and dust effects.

It's supposed to be shiny and new.

HA! I JUST ASKED ABOUT THIS LIKE 30 SECONDS AGO!

Nils I love ya! Well... not like that but.... okay, with 3.0, maybe just a LITTLE like that! ;)

Totally stoked to see what you boys come up with!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
Our plan is to develop 3.0 "as it is" to the point that it "could" be released. Then we will work on the particle effects, and see how quickly we can make progress. The benefit of this solution is that there's a somewhat safe fallback option, but I must confess that I would hate to release version 3.0 with the old smoke, fire, and dust effects.

It's supposed to be shiny and new.

Take your time - don't rush it! I think most people are happy to wait because we will get much more in the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Release it now, and patch the smoke, fire and dust later if it`s ready.

We wait long enough, and it`s time to go back to work on new multiplayer campaigns.

More options in the editor, more playable vehicles, 3rd party, there is enough to explore.

best regards

Duke

Link to post
Share on other sites
Release it now, and patch the smoke, fire and dust later if it`s ready.

We wait long enough, and it`s time to go back to work on new multiplayer campaigns.

More options in the editor, more playable vehicles, 3rd party, there is enough to explore.

best regards

Duke

I agree Duke.

I posted a thread a while back mentioning the possibility of using third party developers.

It was not received well. But I still think its a good idea.

There are a lot of possibility's for the Expansion of SB

The big one would be some sort of WW2 add on pack.

Ssnake has made his opinion on the Subject clear.

And i do respect his reasoning for not wishing to add WW2 vehicles to a degree.

He has a point. But from a armoured vehicles enthusiasts point of view its a damn shame

There is not, Or likely to be a decent accurately made WW2 tank Sim.

Quite a few have been made but none can match SB level of realism and detail

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...