Tjay Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Another great morning!Thanks to all.Now off to see if we can replicate the result at the cricket!Err, I saw the Americans, I saw the Canadians, I saw the Danes, and I saw the Brits. But I didn't see any Australian contingent. :clin: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt DeFault Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Err, I saw the Americans, I saw the Canadians, I saw the Danes, and I saw the Brits. But I didn't see any Australian contingent. :clin:Correction: You saw the Danes and Brits...kicking ass! :gun:Good fight. I had a great time. Thanks to all and I'll see you next time! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoggydog Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 It was a bloody battle on all fronts by the looks of it with a number of different strategies playing out.and god damn if that M1A2 isn't a bitch to kill. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3instein Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Sounds like you all had a good fight,anyone make any video of the action? Cheers, Mick. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 You saw the Danes and Brits...kicking ass! :gun: Well if the Brits going from 42 CR2 to 0 (that's right none left) for the loss of some seven Canadian Leos is "kicking ass" and I suspect (awaiting Tacbat's decision) losing their Northern incursion in the process, then I hope they continue the trend. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoggydog Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Ah Mr Gibson, its all a question of Logistics, I would have thought a man of your rank would look beyond mere numbers pending official counts, I think you will find we came off pretty well 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marko Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Well if the Brits going from 42 CR2 to 0 (that's right none left) for the loss of some seven Canadian Leos is "kicking ass" and I suspect (awaiting Tacbat's decision) losing their Northern incursion in the process, then I hope they continue the trend. Are Tanks cost less then half the Canadians sides tanks to replace. also the Americans lost a M-88 just like The MICLIC.S expensive Assets to replace. we did not loose any of are high value assets. I was unable to down load the AAR but I am pretty sure nearly half of are causality's were from the US side. Hitting us a long range. Do the maths we get 200 points each for the two MICLIC.S that alone that equates to four Replacement Tanks. Also we get 45 points for every tank we killed you side gets twenty five We wont know till we get the official results but we should be able to cover a large percentage of what we lost Think end game and most importantly ( Hell it was fun.) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tjay Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Sounds like you all had a good fight,anyone make any video of the action?Cheers, Mick. We thought you might have been there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 its all a question of Logistics, I would have thought a man of your rank would look beyond mere numbers Indeed but to the purist, logistics is mere numbers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tjay Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Indeed but to the purist, logistics is mere numbers. We understand that there will be an award for 'Most entertaining tactical move' at the end of the campaign. And feel pretty confident about winning it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoggydog Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 We understand that there will be an award for 'Most entertaining tactical move' at the end of the campaign. And feel pretty confident about winning it. It was worth it to hear hedge shout "sod the tanks there's a f**king MICLIC!!!" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotareneg Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 iFBPAGxYsWw 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brun Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Are Tanks cost less then half the Canadians sides tanks to replace. also the Americans lost a M-88 just like The MICLIC.S expensive Assets to replace. we did not loose any of are high value assets.I was unable to down load the AAR but I am pretty sure nearly half of are causality's were from the US side. Hitting us a long range.Do the maths we get 200 points each for the two MICLIC.S that alone that equates to four Replacement Tanks. Also we get 45 points for every tank we killed you side gets twenty fiveWe wont know till we get the official results but we should be able to cover a large percentage of what we lost Think end game and most importantly ( Hell it was fun.)Canadian kills.27 challengers with one killed in US territory by Can artillery. No way to know who dropped the artillery so 26 challengers killed.12 UK pc's killed, and I'll let Tacbat count the dead UK troops.2 DK tanks killed.2 DK pc's killed, and Tacbat can count the dead DK troops.ENG units and recovery are worth a lot of points. There usefulness on this battle field however has been very little up to this point for all sides. No real mine clearing as of yet. Risking 200 points to save a tank or 2 ain't worth it. They are just easy points for the enemy, with little return on investment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marko Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Canadian kills.27 challengers with one killed in US territory by Can artillery. No way to know who dropped the artillery so 26 challengers killed.12 UK pc's killed, and I'll let Tacbat count the dead UK troops.2 DK tanks killed.2 DK pc's killed, and Tacbat can count the dead DK troops.ENG units and recovery are worth a lot of points. There usefulness on this battle field however has been very little up to this point for all sides. No real mine clearing as of yet. Risking 200 points to save a tank or 2 ain't worth it. They are just easy points for the enemy, with little return on investment.No dispute you guys played very well.But what is it going to cost to cover your lossesGibsonm said you guys lost seven tanks, At 140 points each to replace.Plus your pc's at 50 points each and MICLICS at 200. at some stage one side is going to Have to breach the mine fields. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marko Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Kudos Rotareneg.It was great watching you guys in action.What I would ant give to have the frame rate you were getting The were a couple of times my machine was so slow I could hardly control my Tanks 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lt DeFault Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Kudos Rotareneg.It was great watching you guys in action.What I would ant give to have the frame rate you were getting The were a couple of times my machine was so slow I could hardly control my Tanks+1 Mine were tolerable, but just. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brun Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Not counting plows and extra upgrades.2940 points to replace 42 chally'sabout 400 points to replace the warriors and scimitars We killed.Not counting the troops that's about 3340+ points to replace Your losses, 1670+ points just to replace half Your losses. 980 points to replace our tanks190 points to replace our NZlavs and Eagles, not counting troops.If I wanted more ENG units, 200 to replace those for a total of about 1370 points to replace my losses. I have 1370 points with points to spare do you have 3340+ points to replace Yours? If 42 chally's with about 14 or 15 pc's ended with the results of Mission 2 I suspect that half will get You less.You should have been a politician Marko You are good at spinning the truth. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacbat Posted January 19, 2014 Author Share Posted January 19, 2014 Gentlemen, let's keep things on track here please. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tacbat Posted January 19, 2014 Author Share Posted January 19, 2014 Here are the boundaries for mission 3: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotareneg Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Looking at the new boundaries, I'd say Canada and the UK didn't do anything last mission. Come on guys, start playing! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Here are the boundaries for mission 3: Well done Brun, mission results reflect your intent and I'm pretty sure our Southern neighbours are happy too. Marko - don't bother. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rotareneg Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 All kidding aside, I wish I could have watched that battle up north as it happened, it looked mighty dramatic in the AAR. Which reminds me, does anyone have the AAR hosted anywhere? I forgot to save mine. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assassin 7 Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 All kidding aside, I wish I could have watched that battle up north as it happened, it looked mighty dramatic in the AAR. Which reminds me, does anyone have the AAR hosted anywhere? I forgot to save mine. I do come on ts for the AAR 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marko Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Well done Brun, mission results reflect your intent and I'm pretty sure our Southern neighbours are happy too.Marko - don't bother.Gibsonm I don't take orders from you.Brun learn to count. I did not spin anything I simply was showing that Green sideDid not lose so many vehicles in vain.It was a tactical gamble we knew we would take Heavy losses. I also complement your side on its defence.Crusty well done we kept to are agreement with are allies. And lost none of are territory. only the small enclave in enemy territory that was indefensible any way.I find it very disheartening its almost impossible to have a reasoned discussion on this siteWith out people becoming offended.Gibsonm a quote for you.sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.Tacbat PM sent 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assassin 7 Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 Looking at the new boundaries, I'd say Canada and the UK didn't do anything last mission. Come on guys, start playing! Canada actually did a lot for us. Sent Arty to help us and a extra platoon along with stopping a major attack in the north on their territory. As far as I'm concern, Canada did a outstanding job. There are a lot of things during the battle that the Canada CO and myself are communicating about that the players do not hear. So be thankful that the Canada's are allies to us. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.