MDF Posted October 17, 2015 Author Share Posted October 17, 2015 First: YesAMX-30MagachM-51M-48M-60BMR600BMP1BMP2Centurion T-64Hi Stratos, BMR-600 wasn;t originally on the list, but given that it was produced in significant numbers, I've added it to the list. For the record, I also did the same thing earlier with the USSR BRM-1.Also, I assume that "M-51" means M-551 Sheridan, and "Centurion" means "Any Centurion variant." Also, did you mean the original T-64, or "Any USSR T-64 variant"? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
12Alfa Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 M51 is not the M-155, its the M4 with a IDF 105 gun 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonm Posted October 17, 2015 Share Posted October 17, 2015 Also, I assume that "M-51" means M-551 Sheridan, and "Centurion" means "Any Centurion variant." Also, did you mean the original T-64, or "Any USSR T-64 variant"?M51 is not the M-155, its the M4 with a IDF 105 gunAka "Super Sherman" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
streakeagle Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 My favorite tank of all time is the M60A1 as modeled by Tamiya in 1/35 when I was in the first grade. It was the 2nd plastic model I had built (an MPC 1/72 B-17G being the first). I recently picked up SABOW during a steam sale, so I finally have a decent sim/game based on the M60A1. But it isn't in the Cold War setting I would prefer.A Steel Beasts M60A1 modeled as well as the M1 would be my preference, but I would gladly accept any variant of the M60 made crewable. The external-only M60A3 presently available would be a great alternative as a crewable vehicle (even at lo-res). I would also enjoy the challenge of employing the M60A2. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDF Posted October 18, 2015 Author Share Posted October 18, 2015 M51 is not the M-155, its the M4 with a IDF 105 gunStratos, can you confirm whether this is what you meant? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDF Posted October 18, 2015 Author Share Posted October 18, 2015 My favorite tank of all time is the M60A1 as modeled by Tamiya in 1/35 when I was in the first grade. It was the 2nd plastic model I had built (an MPC 1/72 B-17G being the first). I recently picked up SABOW during a steam sale, so I finally have a decent sim/game based on the M60A1. But it isn't in the Cold War setting I would prefer.A Steel Beasts M60A1 modeled as well as the M1 would be my preference, but I would gladly accept any variant of the M60 made crewable. The external-only M60A3 presently available would be a great alternative as a crewable vehicle (even at lo-res). I would also enjoy the challenge of employing the M60A2. OK, but I can't include you in the poll unless you submit something as set forth in the original post. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stratos Posted October 18, 2015 Share Posted October 18, 2015 "M-51" means Super Sherman, the M-51 this little beast:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Sherman"Centurion" means "Any Centurion variant."And "Any USSR T-64 variant" will be good for me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustSomeGuy Posted October 21, 2015 Share Posted October 21, 2015 Low-detail interiors: Yes, if FCS within GPS would be simulated accurately (as is the case with the Challanger 2).[4] T-72M4 CZ[3] BMP-2 IFV[2] Any Cold War T-64 variant[1] Any Cold War M60 variant(Numbers in brackets are indeed points, I just sorted them descending.)Why/Rationale:T-72M4's FCS is easy to implement due to similarity w/ Centauro and would give SB a hi-end T-72 variant. BMP-2 because so far, it's impossible for the OpFor to crew any 30mm/rapid fire cannon platform directly; it terms of playability, it would be the same for RedFor as when BluFor got their crewable Bradleys.T-64 because it would enable conteporary Ukraine and Cold War "Proryvnyj platoons" scenariosM60 for the scenarios where even the baseline M1 is unfair to the poor OpFor and to make many scenarios with only M60-equipped BluFor playable. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDF Posted October 26, 2015 Author Share Posted October 26, 2015 The response to the poll has been fairly anemic so the results are not particularly valid, but here are the top vehicles so far:[Votes] Vehicle[17] Marder 1A3[14] BMP-2[13] Any USSR BMP variant[9] Any Leclerc variant[8] Any Cold-War Marder variant[8] Any USSR T-64 variant[8] Any USSR T-80 variant[7] T-72M4[7] M1A2 SEP v3[6] Any T-90 variant[5] BvS-10[5] Any Challenger 1 variant[5] Any Cold War M2/M3 variant[4] Any Centurion variant[4] M2A3[4] Any M-48 variant[4] M60A3 TTS[4] BMP-1 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 :-D 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marko Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 The response to the poll has been fairly anemic so the results are not particularly valid, but here are the top vehicles so far:[Votes] Vehicle[17] Marder 1A3[14] BMP-2[13] Any USSR BMP variant[9] Any Leclerc variant[8] Any Cold-War Marder variant[8] Any USSR T-64 variant[8] Any USSR T-80 variant[7] T-72M4[7] M1A2 SEP v3[6] Any T-90 variant[5] BvS-10[5] Any Challenger 1 variant[5] Any Cold War M2/M3 variant[4] Any Centurion variant[4] M2A3[4] Any M-48 variant[4] M60A3 TTS[4] BMP-1The results of my far less sophisticated poll are as follows. Poll 1The M-60 topped the poll for a playable addition, But most members agree that a more modern/potent threat Soviet tank would be a good addition Poll 2Playable IFV addition to the new update.The BMP-2 won but it beat the Marder by one vote.Poll 3What New Artillery system would you pick for the next update.The PZH 200 topped the poll But the MLRS came a very close second 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuchs_Leo1_TC Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 2 - T-80UM2 - T-90MS2 - BMPT :gun:2 - T-72B32 - T-64BM 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy276 Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 And the results for a non-crewable vehicle? :confused: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDF Posted October 27, 2015 Author Share Posted October 27, 2015 And the results for a non-crewable vehicle? :confused:Not sure what you mean. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 And the results for a non-crewable vehicle? :confused:Didn't see him ask a question for that. So I do not expect results on it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deputy276 Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Never mind. Read the question wrong. It is an interesting question, though. Perhaps I will start another thread and ask it. :bigsmile: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grenny Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Never mind. Read the question wrong. It is an interesting question, though. Perhaps I will start another thread and ask it. :bigsmile: Well, go ahead then and set one up... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.